Did a quality improvement intervention improve quality of maternal health care? Implementation evaluation from a cluster-randomized controlled study
- PMID: 31829427
- PMCID: PMC7172021
- DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz126
Did a quality improvement intervention improve quality of maternal health care? Implementation evaluation from a cluster-randomized controlled study
Abstract
Objective: To test the success of a maternal healthcare quality improvement intervention in actually improving quality.
Design: Cluster-randomized controlled study with implementation evaluation; we randomized 12 primary care facilities to receive a quality improvement intervention, while 12 facilities served as controls.
Setting: Four districts in rural Tanzania.
Participants: Health facilities (24), providers (70 at baseline; 119 at endline) and patients (784 at baseline; 886 at endline).
Interventions: In-service training, mentorship and supportive supervision and infrastructure support.
Main outcome measures: We measured fidelity with indictors of quality and compared quality between intervention and control facilities using difference-in-differences analysis.
Results: Quality of care was low at baseline: the average provider knowledge test score was 46.1% (range: 0-75%) and only 47.9% of women were very satisfied with delivery care. The intervention was associated with an increase in newborn counseling (β: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.13, 1.35) but no evidence of change across 17 additional indicators of quality. On average, facilities reached 39% implementation. Comparing facilities with the highest implementation of the intervention to control facilities again showed improvement on only one of the 18 quality indicators.
Conclusions: A multi-faceted quality improvement intervention resulted in no meaningful improvement in quality. Evidence suggests this is due to both failure to sustain a high-level of implementation and failure in theory: quality improvement interventions targeted at the clinic-level in primary care clinics with weak starting quality, including poor infrastructure and low provider competence, may not be effective.
Keywords: Tanzania; cluster-randomized controlled study; implementation science; maternal health; quality improvement; quality measurement.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
References
-
- Fink G, Ross R, Hill K. Institutional deliveries weakly associated with improved neonatal survival in developing countries: evidence from 192 demographic and health surveys. Int J Epidemiol 2015. PubMed PMID: 26130739. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group. Birth 1997;24:121–3. PubMed PMID: 9271979. - PubMed
