Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 4;11(11):e6071.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.6071.

Effect of Paper- and Computer-based Simulated Instructions on Clinical Reasoning Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students: A Randomized Control Trial

Affiliations

Effect of Paper- and Computer-based Simulated Instructions on Clinical Reasoning Skills of Undergraduate Medical Students: A Randomized Control Trial

Masood Jawaid et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objectives Skilled clinical reasoning is a critical tool for physicians. Educators agree that this skill should be formally taught and assessed. Objectives related to the mastery of clinical reasoning skills appear in the documentation of most medical schools and licensing bodies. We conducted this study to assess the differences in clinical reasoning skills in medical students following paper- and computer-based simulated instructions. Materials and methods A total of 52 sixth semester medical students of the Dow University of Health Sciences were included in this study. A tutorial was delivered to all students on clinical reasoning and its importance in clinical practice. Students were divided randomly into two groups: group A received paper-based instructions while group B received computer-based instructions (as Flash-based scenarios developed with Articulate Storyline software [https://articulate.com/p/storyline-3]) focused on clinical reasoning skills in history-taking of acute and chronic upper abdominal pain. After one week, both groups were tested at two objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) stations to assess acute and chronic pain history-taking skills in relation to clinical reasoning. Results There were 27 students in group A and 25 students in group B. The mean OSCE score for group A (paper-based) was 28.6 ± 9.4 and that for group B (computer-based) was 38.5 ± 6.0. Group B's mean score was statistically significantly greater (p < 0.001) than group A's mean score for clinical reasoning skills. Conclusion A computer simulation program can enhance clinical reasoning skills. This technology could be used to acquaint students with real-life experiences and identify potential areas for more training before facing real patients.

Keywords: blended learning; clinical reasoning; computer based learning; simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean OSCE Score
OSCE: Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alfaro-LeFevre Alfaro-LeFevre, R R. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2009. Critical Thinking and Clinical Judgement: A Practical Approach to Outcome-Focused Thinking.
    1. The effects of human patient simulators on basic knowledge in critical care nursing with undergraduate senior baccalaureate nursing students. Hoffmann R, O’Donnell J, Kim Kim, Y Y. Simul Healthc. 2007;2:110–114. - PubMed
    1. Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Bellchambers H, Fernandez R. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010;6:207–222. - PubMed
    1. Quality in Australian health care study. Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Hamilton JD. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8668084 Med J Aust. 1996;164:754. - PubMed
    1. Outreach - a strategy for improving the care of the acutely ill hospitalized patient. Bright D, Walker W, Bion J. Crit Care Medicine. 2004;8:33–40. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources