Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 6;7(23):3915-3933.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i23.3915.

Overview of organic anion transporters and organic anion transporter polypeptides and their roles in the liver

Affiliations
Review

Overview of organic anion transporters and organic anion transporter polypeptides and their roles in the liver

Ting-Ting Li et al. World J Clin Cases. .

Abstract

Organic anion transporters (OATs) and organic anion transporter polypeptides (OATPs) are classified within two SLC superfamilies, namely, the SLC22A superfamily and the SLCO superfamily (formerly the SLC21A family), respectively. They are expressed in many tissues, such as the liver and kidney, and mediate the absorption and excretion of many endogenous and exogenous substances, including various drugs. Most are composed of 12 transmembrane polypeptide chains with the C-terminus and the N-terminus located in the cell cytoplasm. OATs and OATPs are abundantly expressed in the liver, where they mainly promote the uptake of various endogenous substrates such as bile acids and various exogenous drugs such as antifibrotic and anticancer drugs. However, differences in the locations of glycosylation sites, phosphorylation sites, and amino acids in the OAT and OATP structures lead to different substrates being transported to the liver, which ultimately results in their different roles in the liver. To date, few articles have addressed these aspects of OAT and OATP structures, and we study further the similarities and differences in their structures, tissue distribution, substrates, and roles in liver diseases.

Keywords: Liver cancer; Liver cirrhosis; Liver fibrosis; Organic anion; Substrate transport; Targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: No potential conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of organic anion transporters and organic anion transporter polypeptides. The structures of the family members of organic anion transporter (OAT) are similar. They each consist of 12 transmembrane domains (TMD) with three highly conserved regions: (1) The large extracellular loop between TMD1 and TMD2 has many glycosylation sites; and (2) the large intracellular loop between TMD6 and TMD7 has residues that are phosphorylated; and (3) TMD9 and TMD10 contain important amino acids. The C-terminus and N-terminus of OATs are located in the cytoplasm. The organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP) family members have 12 transmembrane segments, which can form six extracellular loops and five intracellular loops. The C-terminus and N-terminus are located in the cytoplasm. One of the OATP members, OATP1B1, is glycosylated in the 2nd and 5th extracellular loops, and it is predicted that other OATPs may also be glycosylated in these two extracellular loops.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Role of organic anion transporters/organic anion transporter polypeptides in the transport of bile acids through the “intestinal-liver-kidney” axis. In order to maintain the important physiological process of enterohepatic circulation of bile, hepatocytes recover bile acids from portal vein blood through certain members of the organic anion transporter polypeptide family (e.g., OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OATP2B1). OAT3 plays a central role in the movement of bile acid through the “intestinal-liver-kidney” axis and is involved in the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of bile acids. OAT: Organic anion transporters.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hepatocyte nuclear factor regulates organic anion transporters and organic anion transporter polypeptides through a mechanism composed of a series of cascade reactions. In this cascade, various bile acids can enhance the transactivation ability of farnesoid X receptor (FXR). (1) FXR can activate the target gene SHP. SHP negatively regulates HNF-4a, a common target of SHP; (2) In addition to its activation through the SHP-dependent mechanism, FXR may directly bind to negative reaction elements (X) located in the promoter of HNF-4a. The binding of HNF-4a and OAT2 is inhibited by the processes of 1 and 2 (the common binding sites of HNF-4a were identified between 329 and 317 upstream of the transcriptional initiation site of OAT2); (3) HNF-1a is regulated by HNF-4a such that the downregulation of HNF-4a can downregulate OATP1B1, OAT3, OAT5, and OAT7; and (4) the decreased activity of HNF4-alpha inhibits the interaction between HNF4α and β-catenin, thus downregulating the expression of OATP1B3. HNF: Hepatocyte nuclear factor; FXR: Farnesoid X receptor; SHP: A transcriptional repressor belonging to the nuclear receptor family; X: Unknown negative reaction elements in the HNF-4a promoter.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nigam SK. The SLC22 Transporter Family: A Paradigm for the Impact of Drug Transporters on Metabolic Pathways, Signaling, and Disease. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;58:663–687. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ. Organic anion transporting polypeptides of the OATP/ SLC21 family: phylogenetic classification as OATP/ SLCO superfamily, new nomenclature and molecular/functional properties. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:653–665. - PubMed
    1. Shitara Y, Horie T, Sugiyama Y. Transporters as a determinant of drug clearance and tissue distribution. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2006;27:425–446. - PubMed
    1. Roth M, Obaidat A, Hagenbuch B. OATPs, OATs and OCTs: the organic anion and cation transporters of the SLCO and SLC22A gene superfamilies. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165:1260–1287. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meier PJ. Molecular mechanisms of hepatic bile salt transport from sinusoidal blood into bile. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:G801–G812. - PubMed