Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 2;3(6):759-766.
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50191. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing vascular surgery

A Knighton  1 , G Martin  1   2 , V Sounderajah  1   2 , L Warren  1 , O Markiewicz  1 , C Riga  1   2 , C Bicknell  1   2
Affiliations

Avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing vascular surgery

A Knighton et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract
in English, Spanish

Background: Vascular surgery has one of the highest unplanned 30-day readmission rates of all surgical specialties. The degree to which these may be avoidable and the optimal strategies to reduce their occurrence are unknown. The aim of this study was to identify and classify avoidable 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing vascular surgery in order to plan targeted interventions to reduce their occurrence, improve outcomes and reduce cost.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of discharges over a 12-month period from a single tertiary vascular unit was performed. A multidisciplinary panel conducted a manual case-note review to identify and classify those 30-day unplanned emergency readmissions deemed avoidable.

Results: An unplanned 30-day readmission occurred in 72 of 885 admissions (8·1 per cent). These unplanned readmissions were deemed avoidable in 36 (50 per cent) of these 72 patients, and were most frequently due to unresolved medical issues (19 of 36, 53 per cent) and inappropriate admission with the potential for outpatient management (7 of 36, 19 per cent). A smaller number were due to inadequate social care provision (4 of 36, 11 per cent) and the occurrence of other avoidable adverse events (4 of 36, 11 per cent).

Conclusion: Half of all 30-day readmissions following vascular surgery are potentially avoidable. Multidisciplinary coordination of inpatient care and the transition from hospital to community care after discharge need to be improved.

Antecedentes: La cirugía vascular tiene una de las tasas más elevadas de reingresos no planificados a los 30 días de todas las especialidades quirúrgicas. Se desconoce hasta qué punto este problema puede ser evitable y las estrategias óptimas para su disminución. El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar y clasificar los reingresos evitables a los 30 días en pacientes sometidos a cirugía vascular para planificar intervenciones dirigidas a su disminución, mejorar los resultados y reducir el coste.

Métodos: Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de las altas hospitalarias durante un periodo de 12 meses en una unidad vascular terciaria. Un panel multidisciplinario realizó una revisión manual de los casos para identificar y clasificar aquellos reingresos urgentes no planificados a los 30 días que se considerasen evitables.

Resultados: Se registró un reingreso no planificado a los 30 días en 72/885 (8,1%) ingresos. Estos reingresos no planificados fueron considerados evitables en el 50,0% (36/72) y fueron debidos con más frecuencia a cuestiones médicas sin resolver (19/36, 52,8%) y a un ingreso no apropiado con la posibilidad de tratamiento ambulatorio (7/36, 19,4%). En un número menor de casos se debió a una asistencia social inadecuada (4/36, 11,1%) y la aparición de otros eventos adversos evitables (4/36, 11,1%).

Conclusión: La mitad de los reingresos a los 30 días en pacientes vasculares son potencialmente evitables. Tras el alta hospitalaria debe mejorarse la coordinación multidisciplinaria de la atención hospitalaria y la transición desde el hospital a la atención comunitaria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patients included in the study
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bar chart showing subgroup classification by an expert panel of avoidable 30‐day readmissions in 36 patients Admission category: A, unresolved issue on discharge; B, inappropriate admission; C, inadequate social support; D, adverse event; E, other.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical readmissions and relationship to quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1134–1142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joynt KE, Jha AK. Thirty‐day readmissions – truth and consequences. N Engl J Med Internet 2012; 366: 1366–1369. - PubMed
    1. Fischer C, Lingsma HF, Marang‐van De Mheen PJ, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS, Steyerberg EW. Is the readmission rate a valid quality indicator? A review of the evidence. PLoS One 2014; 9: 1–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Audit Office . Emergency Admissions to Hospital: Managing the Demand; 2013. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/emergency-admissions-hospitals-managing-de... [accessed 18 March 2019].
    1. Lucas DJ, Pawlik TM. Readmission after surgery. Adv Surg 2014; 48: 185–199. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms