Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Jan;87(1):17-25.
doi: 10.1007/s12098-019-03098-w. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Nitazoxanide in the Treatment of Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Nitazoxanide in the Treatment of Intestinal Parasitic Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jinyi Li et al. Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in intestinal parasitic infections in children.

Methods: Four databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, have been systematically searched from the inception of each database up to March 1st, 2019. The enrolled studies were limited to randomized clinical trials in children, comparing nitazoxanide with placebo or other antiparasitic drugs. The data extraction and quality assessment of pooled studies were conducted by two reviewers independently. For meta-analysis, Stata12.0 was used and a randomized effect model or a fixed effect model was selected according to the outcomes of heterogeneity test.

Results: A total of 1645 subjects in 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were enrolled, including 768 cases in the trial group and 877 cases in the control group. The effect of nitazoxanide vs. placebo and other antiparasitic drugs on the excretion rate of pathogens was uncertain (OR = 2.06, 95%CI [1.01,4.20], P = 0.047; I2 = 84.7%; very low quality evidence). Compared with placebo, subgroup analysis suggested that nitazoxanide could significantly improve the excretion rate of pathogens (OR = 7.01, 95%CI [1.82,26.94], P = 0.005; I2 = 79.1%; moderate quality evidence), while it made little or no difference compared with antiparasitic drugs (OR = 0.72, 95%CI [0.47,1.09], P = 0.124; I2 = 33.1%; low quality evidence). Meanwhile, nitazoxanide might increase the remission rate of diarrhea with OR = 5.12, 95%CI [2.00,13.08], P = 0.001; I2 = 72.3%; low quality evidence). However, it might also increase the rate of adverse events (OR = 1.47, 95%CI [1.05,2.07], P = 0.026; I2 = 44.7%; low quality evidence).

Conclusions: The authors are uncertain whether or not nitazoxanide could improve the excretion rate of pathogens. Based on low-certainty evidence, nitazoxanide may improve the remission rate of diarrhea in children with intestinal parasite infections, but it may be associated with an increased risk of adverse reactions. Hence, more RCTs with a low risk of bias are still needed to assess the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide.

Keywords: Children; Intestinal parasitic infections; Meta-analysis; Nitazoxanide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Oct;101(10):1025-31 - PubMed
    1. Parasit Vectors. 2016 Sep 05;9(1):488 - PubMed
    1. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002 May;40(5):221-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jun 15;32(12):1792-4 - PubMed
    1. Wiad Parazytol. 2010;56(1):11-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources