Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;48(7):881-894.
doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4.

Application of the Bifactor S - 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings

Affiliations

Application of the Bifactor S - 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings

G Leonard Burns et al. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

The symmetrical bifactor model is often applied to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-hyperactive/impulsive (HI), ADHD-inattentive (IN), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, but this model frequently yields anomalous or inadmissible results. An alternative model, the bifactor S - 1 model, is more appropriate for examining the hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms. Both models were applied to ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptom ratings by mothers, fathers, and teachers for 2142 Spanish children (49.49% girls; ages 8-13 years). The symmetrical bifactor model yielded the typical anomalous loadings, with a weakly defined ADHD-HI specific factor and difficult to interpret associations of general and specific factors with correlates. In contrast, the bifactor S - 1 model with ADHD-HI symptoms as general reference factor produced clearly interpretable results. For mothers and fathers, slightly more than 50% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. For teachers, approximately 69% and 39% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms, respectively, represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. The general ADHD-HI reference factor and specific ADHD-IN and ODD residual factors showed convergent and discriminant validity across sources, along with unique associations with peer rejection, social impairment, and academic impairment factors. The bifactor S - 1 model also yielded results consistent with predictions from trait-impulsivity theory of ADHD/ODD development. Researchers should use the bifactor S - 1 model rather than the symmetrical bifactor model if hypotheses involve the latent hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms.

Keywords: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; Bifactor S – 1 model; Bifactor model; Disruptive behavior disorders; Oppositional defiant disorder; P factor; Trait impulsivity theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors of the current study have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic representations of the symmetrical and S – 1 bifactor models of ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and OD symptoms (only the first and last symptom are shown for each of the three symptom sets to reduce the complexity of the figure). HI = hyperactivity-impulsivity; IN = inattention; OD = oppositional defiant disorder; DB = disruptive behavior; GF = general factor; SF = specific factor; GRF = general reference factor; SRF = specific residual factor.

Comment in

References

    1. Arias VB, Ponce FP, & Núñez DE (2018). Bifactor models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): An evaluation of three necessary but underused psychometric indexes. Assessment, 25, 885–897. doi: 10.1177/1073191116679260 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beauchaine TP (2015). Future directions in emotion dysregulation and youth psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 875–896. doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1038827 - PubMed
    1. Beauchaine TP, & Constantino JN (2017). Redefining the endophenotype concept to accommodate transdiagnostic vulnerabilities and etiological complexity. Biomarkers in Medicine, 11, 769–780. doi: 10.221/bmm-2017-0002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchaine TP, & McNulty T (2013). Comorbidities and continuities as ontogenic processes: Toward a developmental spectrum model of externalizing psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1505–1528. doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000746 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchaine TP, Zisner A, & Sauder CL (2017). Trait impulsivity and the externalizing spectrum. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 343–368. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093253 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources