Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;29(4):591-603.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5310. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Digital interventions to facilitate patient-provider communication in cancer care: A systematic review

Affiliations

Digital interventions to facilitate patient-provider communication in cancer care: A systematic review

Y Alicia Hong et al. Psychooncology. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Patient-provider communication is a critical component of cancer care. Digital tools have been applied to facilitate cancer care and patient-provider communication. However, to date, there is no systematic review on this growing body of literature. The objective of this study is to identify the existing digital interventions to improve patient-provider communication among cancer patients and survivors, summarize their characteristics, and synthesize the outcomes of these interventions.

Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines with the following criteria: (a) empirical studies focusing on digital interventions to facilitate communication between cancer patients or survivors and their health care providers, (b) reporting qualitative or quantitative health outcomes of the cancer patients or survivors after the digital intervention, and (c) English articles published after 2000.

Results: The initial literature search generated 1006 articles; only 13 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were conducted among breast, prostate, and lung cancer patients. Ten out of 13 studies used randomized controlled trials to evaluate intervention efficacy. The outcomes assessed included symptoms reporting and management, decision making, distress and quality of life, and utilization of health care. Most studies reported positive outcomes following the interventions.

Conclusions: The existing evidence on the number, characteristics, and outcomes of digital interventions to improve patient-provider communication suggests the preliminary efficacy of such interventions. It is essential to develop and implement more evidence-based digital interventions to engage patients, enhance patient-provider communication, and facilitate patient-centered decision making to improve patient-centered health outcomes, especially in underserved communities of cancer patients and survivors.

Keywords: cancer patients; cancer survivors; digital intervention; patient-provider communication; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer: fact sheet. 2018; Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer
    1. National Cancer Institute (NCI). Cancer stat 2018; Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics
    1. Li CC, Matthews AK, Dossaji M, Fullam F. The relationship of patient-provider communication on quality of life among African-American and white cancer survivors. J Heal Commun. June 6, 2017. 2017;22(7):584-92.
    1. Epstein RM, Fiscella K, Lesser CS, Stange KC. Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Heal Aff. August 4, 2010. 2010;29(8):1489-95.
    1. Kallander K, Tibenderana JK, Akpogheneta OJ, Strachan DL, Hill Z, ten Asbroek AH, et al. Mobile health (mHealth) approaches and lessons for increased performance and retention of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a review. J Med Internet Res. January 29, 2013. 2013;15(1):e17.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources