Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan-Feb;20(1):14-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Comparison between surgical and catheter based ablation in atrial fibrillation, should surgical based ablation be implemented as first line? - A meta-analysis of studies

Affiliations

Comparison between surgical and catheter based ablation in atrial fibrillation, should surgical based ablation be implemented as first line? - A meta-analysis of studies

Emir Yonas et al. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Ablation remains a modality of choice in select patients with Atrial fibrillation (AF). Which is done via a surgical or catheter-based approach.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of Surgical and Catheter ablation in the management of AF.

Methods: Electronic search on PubMed (MEDLINE), EBSCO, EuropePMC, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar was done. Studies comparing the use of surgical or catheter ablation in patients with AF were included. The Primary outcome of interest was Arrhythmia free patients at 12 months post-ablation.

Results: Eight studies (744 patients) reported a statistically significant difference in Arrhythmia recurrence rate between surgical and catheter-based ablation. The pooled hazard ratio was chosen to compare the risk of AF recurrence between these groups with pooled Hazard ratio comparing surgical to catheter approach of 0.40 [0.35,0.45], p < 0.001 favoring surgical approach; low heterogeneity I2 22%, p = 0.25. Meta-analyses were also performed on procedural time, length of stay and major adverse events.

Conclusion: The increased rate of adverse effects and length of hospitalization impedes the implementation of surgical ablation as primary ablation method of AF in general. However, the result of our meta-analysis shows the promising result of surgical ablation compared to catheter-based ablation.

Keywords: Arrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Surgical ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A. Risk of bias graph. B. Risk of bias summary.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Meta-analysis, AF Recurrence rate at 12 Months, Pooled HR Favoring surgical ablation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Meta-analysis, Procedure time, Pooled mean difference (minutes) favoring catheter.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Meta-Analysis, Major Adverse events, Pooled OR Favoring Catheter.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Meta-Analysis, Length of Hospitalization, pooled mean difference (days) favoring catheter.

References

    1. Atrial fibrillation: current understandings and research imperatives. The National heart, lung, and blood institute working group on atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(7):1830–1834. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7902370 - PubMed
    1. Lip G.Y., Metcalfe M.J., Rae A.P. Management of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Q J Med. 1993;86(8):467–472. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8210304 - PubMed
    1. Englund A., Walfridsson H., Hansen P.S. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Surv Anesthesiol. 2014;58(1):53–54.
    1. Morillo C.A., Verma A., Connolly S.J. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2) a randomized trial. JAMA, J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311(7):692–699. - PubMed
    1. Adiyaman A., Buist T.J., Beukema R.J. Randomized controlled trial of surgical versus catheter ablation for paroxysmal and early persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2018;11(10) - PubMed