Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar;8(3):157-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

Diuretic Strategies for Loop Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure: The 3T Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Diuretic Strategies for Loop Diuretic Resistance in Acute Heart Failure: The 3T Trial

Zachary L Cox et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared combination diuretic strategies in acute heart failure (AHF) complicated by diuretic resistance (DR).

Background: Combination diuretic regimens to overcome loop DR are commonly used but with limited evidence.

Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blinded trial in 60 patients hospitalized with AHF and intravenous (IV) loop DR. Patients were randomized to oral metolazone, IV chlorothiazide, or tolvaptan therapy. All patients received concomitant high-dose IV infusions of furosemide. The primary outcome was 48-h weight loss.

Results: The cohort exhibited DR prior to enrollment, producing 1,188 ± 476 ml of urine in 12 h during high-dose loop diuretic therapy (IV furosemide: 612 ± 439 mg/day). All 3 interventions significantly improved diuretic efficacy (p < 0.001). Compared to metolazone (4.6 ± 2.7 kg), neither IV chlorothiazide (5.8 ± 2.7 kg; 1.2 kg [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -2.9 to 0.6; p = 0.292) nor tolvaptan (4.1 ± 3.3 kg; 0.5 kg [95% CI: -1.5 to 2.4; p = 0.456) resulted in more weight loss at 48 h. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) cumulative urine output increased significantly and did not differ among those receiving metolazone (7.78 [IQR: 6.59 to 10.10] l) and chlorothiazide (8.77 [IQR: 7.37 to 10.86] l; p = 0.245) or tolvaptan (9.70 [IQR: 6.36 to 13.81] l; p = 0.160). Serum sodium decreased less with tolvaptan than with metolazone (+4 ± 5 vs. -1 ± 3 mEq/l; p = 0.001), but 48-h spot urine sodium was lower with tolvaptan (58 ± 25 mmol/l) than with metolazone (104 ± 16 mmol/l; p = 0.002) and with chlorothiazide (117 ± 14 mmol/l; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this moderately sized DR trial, weight loss was excellent with the addition of metolazone, IV chlorothiazide, or tolvaptan to loop diuretics, without a detectable between-group difference. (Comparison of Oral or Intravenous Thiazides vs. tolvaptan in Diuretic Resistant Decompensated Heart Failure [3T]; NCT02606253).

Keywords: acute heart failure; diuretic resistance; diuretics; heart failure; thiazide; tolvaptan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Dr. Cox reports research support from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Testani reports research support from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals and Honoraria for DSMB participation form Bayer. The authors have no other relevant conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Patient flow diagram
While the primary analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, a supplemental per protocol analysis was performed only in patients receiving all study diuretic doses. AHF= acute heart failure; LHC = left heart catheterization; MD = treating physician”
Figure 2A:
Figure 2A:. Laboratory value trends
Trend of serum sodium (mEq/L) - (Metolazone = blue circles; Chlorothiazide = red squares; Tolvaptan = green triangles). 2B: Trend of serum chloride (mEq/L). 2C: Trend of serum potassium (mEq/L). 2D: Trend of eGFR
Central Illustration.
Central Illustration.. 48-hour diuretic efficacy
Part A: 48-hour cumulative weight loss – Mean ± SD Weight loss over 48 hours. Part B: 48-hour cumulative urine output – Median (IQR) urine output over 48 hours

Comment in

References

    1. Testani JM, Brisco MA, Turner JM et al. Loop diuretic efficiency: a metric of diuretic responsiveness with prognostic importance in acute decompensated heart failure. Circulation Heart failure 2014;7:261–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rao VS, Planavsky N, Hanberg JS et al. Compensatory Distal Reabsorption Drives Diuretic Resistance in Human Heart Failure. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN 2017; 28:3414–3424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ter Maaten JM, Rao VS, Hanberg JS et al. Renal tubular resistance is the primary driver for loop diuretic resistance in acute heart failure. European journal of heart failure 2017; 19:1014–1022. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013;62:1495–1539. - PubMed
    1. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. European heart journal 2016;37:2129–2200. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data