Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;86(5):903-912.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.14197. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

Impact of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients

Affiliations

Impact of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients

Yeo Jin Choi et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 May.

Abstract

Aims: To promote effective methods to improve overutilization patterns of acid-suppressive therapy in hospitalized patients and to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team efforts to reduce inappropriate use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in low-risk patients.

Methods: A multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative incorporating education, medication use reviews and reconciliation, and pharmaceutical intervention was implemented in June 2018 for surgical patients hospitalized via emergency department. For the pre-post analysis and time series analysis, patients admitted during April and May were classified into the pre-intervention cohort and those admitted during July and August into the post-intervention cohort.

Results: Three hundred and seventeen patients were included in this study (153 and 164 in the pre- and post-intervention cohorts, respectively). The multidisciplinary program was effective in reducing overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis and healthcare expenses associated with it. Biweekly education on risk factors warranting stress ulcer prophylaxis was provided for clinicians, and acid-suppressive therapy was removed from a preset list of admission orders. The incidence of inappropriate prophylaxis use declined substantially following intervention in overall patients (OR = 0.51, P = 0.01) and a significant decrease was primarily observed among non-ICU patients (OR = 0.50, P = 0.01). Interrupted time series analysis confirmed the significant decline in inappropriate use post intervention (coefficient = -0.63, P < 0.001). The total healthcare expenses associated with such overuse decreased by 58.5% from US$ 19.39 to US$ 8.04 per 100 patient-days.

Conclusions: Our multidisciplinary team efforts were associated with improvement in stress ulcer prophylaxis overuse patterns, resulting in a substantial decrease in the incidence of inappropriate use, especially in general wards, and associated healthcare costs.

Keywords: acid suppression; multidisciplinary; quality improvement; stress ulcer prophylaxis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Daily incidence of inappropriate SUP use per 100 patients during pre‐ and post‐intervention periods. The vertical line denotes the implementation of the multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative concerning appropriate usage of SUP. Abbreviations: SUP, stress ulcer prophylaxis; ICU, intensive care unit

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shin S. Evaluation of costs accrued through inadvertent continuation of hospital‐initiated proton pump inhibitor therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis beyond hospital discharge: a retrospective chart review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:649‐657. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plummer M, Blaser A, Deane A. Stress ulceration: prevalence, pathology and association with adverse outcomes. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mutlu GM, Mutlu EA, Factor P. GI complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2001;119(4):1222‐1241. - PubMed
    1. Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH, et al. Lacroix, J, Griffith L, Willan a; Canadian critical care trials group. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian critical trials group. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(6):377‐381. - PubMed
    1. Cook DJ, Griffith LE, Walter SD, et al. The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2001;5(6):368‐375. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances