Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Mar/Apr;31(2):475-479.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006054.

Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Comparison With Two Open-Source Softwares

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia: A Comparison With Two Open-Source Softwares

Valentino Vellone et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr.

Abstract

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) is a condyle disorder that arises due to osteoblastic hyperactivity, resulting in facial asymmetry, malocclusion and dysfunction. Authors, in this retrospective study, compared "gold standard" manual-segmentation with a "semi-manual one" using 2 kinds of open-source software (Horos and ITK-SNAP; Penn Image Computing and Science Laboratory) to calculate volume of 80 UCH condyles (40 patients). Moreover, volumetric differences between affected condyle and unaffected 1, between males and females, ages, and classification type were also analyzed. Fifteen patients (37.5%) were male and 25 (62.5%) were female. The gender ratio was 5:2, not far from the ratio 2:1 shown in literature. The mean age was 24 (SD 8.6) years; 22.9 (SD 6.6) for males and 24.6 (SD 9.6) for females according with the mean age derived from the Raijmakers et al meta-analysis and the Nitzan et al study. Right side (60%, 24 patients) was more often affected than the left side (40%, 16 patients). The 67.5% (27 patients) were classified as trasversal type, 25% (10 patients) as vertical types and 7.5% (3 patients) as combined. Despite Horos and ITK-SNAP values presenting some differences, the data follows the same tendency. The relationship is stronger for healthy condyles than affected condyles.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Almeida LE, Zacharias J, Pierce S. Condylar hyperplasia: an updated review of the literature. Korean J Orthod 2015; 45:333–340.
    1. Kawamoto HK, Kim SS, Jarrahy R, et al. Differential diagnosis of the idiopathic laterally deviated mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124:1599–1609.
    1. Nitzan DW, Katsnelson A, Bermanis I, et al. The clinical characteristics of condylar hyperplasia: experience with 61 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:312–318.
    1. Fariña R, Olate S, Raposo A, et al. High condylectomy versus proportional condylectomy: is secondary orthognathic surgery necessary? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016; 45:72–77.
    1. Saridin CP, Raijmakers PGHM, Tuinzing DB, et al. Bone scintigraphy as a diagnostic method in unilateral hyperactivity of the mandibular condyles: a review and meta-analysis of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 40:11–17.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources