Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):1691.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8023-3.

Round hole, square peg: a discourse analysis of social inequalities and the political legitimization of health technology in Norway

Daniel Weiss  1   2
Affiliations

Round hole, square peg: a discourse analysis of social inequalities and the political legitimization of health technology in Norway

Daniel Weiss. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: As research increasingly investigates the impacts of technological innovations in health on social inequalities, political discourse often promotes development and adoption, limiting an understanding of unintended consequences. This study aimed to investigate national public health policy discourse focusing on innovative health technology and social inequalities, from a Norwegian context.

Methods: The analysis relies on a perspective inspired by critical discourse analysis using central State documents typically influential in the lawmaking procedure.

Results: The results and discussion focus on three major discourse strands: 1) 'technologies discourse' (types of technologies), 2) 'responsibility discourse' (who has responsibility for health and technology), 3) 'legitimization discourse' (how technologies are legitimized).

Conclusions: Results suggest that despite an overt political imperative for reducing social inequalities, the Norwegian national discourse gives little attention to the potential for these innovations to unintentionally (re) produce social inequalities. Instead, it is characterized by neoliberal undertones, individualizing and commercializing public health and promoting pro-innovation ideology.

Keywords: Discourse analysis; Health; Innovation; Norway; Social inequality; Technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coding form (in full)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Coding form (in full) used during analysis of the relevant texts
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sveiby K-E. Gripenberg P and Segercrantz B. Challenging the innovation paradigm: Routledge; 2012.
    1. Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health. 2013;11:256–270. doi: 10.1057/sth.2013.10. - DOI
    1. Gabe J, Monaghan L. Key concepts in medical sociology: Sage; 2013.
    1. Latulippe Karine, Hamel Christine, Giroux Dominique. Social Health Inequalities and eHealth: A Literature Review With Qualitative Synthesis of Theoretical and Empirical Studies. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19(4):e136. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6731. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lupton D. Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary. Health Promot Int. 2015;30:174–183. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau091. - DOI - PubMed