Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):723.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3723-7.

ELECtric Tibial nerve stimulation to Reduce Incontinence in Care homes: protocol for the ELECTRIC randomised trial

J Booth  1 , L Aucott  2 , S Cotton  2 , C Goodman  3 , S Hagen  4 , D Harari  5 , M Lawrence  6 , A Lowndes  7 , L Macaulay  6 , G MacLennan  8 , H Mason  9 , D McClurg  4 , J Norrie  10 , C Norton  11 , C O'Dolan  6 , D A Skelton  6 , C Surr  12 , S Treweek  2
Affiliations

ELECtric Tibial nerve stimulation to Reduce Incontinence in Care homes: protocol for the ELECTRIC randomised trial

J Booth et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is highly prevalent in nursing and residential care homes (CHs) and profoundly impacts on residents' dignity and quality of life. CHs predominantly use absorbent pads to contain UI rather than actively treat the condition. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) is a non-invasive, safe and low-cost intervention with demonstrated effectiveness for reducing UI in adults. However, the effectiveness of TPTNS to treat UI in older adults living in CHs is not known. The ELECTRIC trial aims to establish if a programme of TPTNS is a clinically effective treatment for UI in CH residents and investigate the associated costs and consequences.

Methods: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised parallel-group trial comparing the effectiveness of TPTNS (target n = 250) with sham stimulation (target n = 250) in reducing volume of UI in CH residents. CH residents (men and women) with self- or staff-reported UI of more than once per week are eligible to take part, including those with cognitive impairment. Outcomes will be measured at 6, 12 and 18 weeks post randomisation using the following measures: 24-h Pad Weight Tests, post void residual urine (bladder scans), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition, Minnesota Toileting Skills Questionnaire and Dementia Quality of Life. Economic evaluation based on a bespoke Resource Use Questionnaire will assess the costs of providing a programme of TPTNS. A concurrent process evaluation will investigate fidelity to the intervention and influencing factors, and qualitative interviews will explore the experiences of TPTNS from the perspective of CH residents, family members, CH staff and managers.

Discussion: TPTNS is a non-invasive intervention that has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing UI in adults. The ELECTRIC trial will involve CH staff delivering TPTNS to residents and establish whether TPTNS is more effective than sham stimulation for reducing the volume of UI in CH residents. Should TPTNS be shown to be an effective and acceptable treatment for UI in older adults in CHs, it will provide a safe, low-cost and dignified alternative to the current standard approach of containment and medication.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03248362. Registered on 14 August 2017. ISRCTN, ISRCTN98415244. Registered on 25 April 2018. https://www.isrctn.com/.

Keywords: Care homes; Nursing home; Older adults; Tibial nerve stimulation; Urinary incontinence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Resident flowchart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. D'Ancona Carlos, Haylen Bernard, Oelke Matthias, Abranches‐Monteiro Luis, Arnold Edwin, Goldman Howard, Hamid Rizwan, Homma Yukio, Marcelissen Tom, Rademakers Kevin, Schizas Alexis, Singla Ajay, Soto Irela, Tse Vincent, de Wachter Stefan, Herschorn Sender. The International Continence Society (ICS) report on the terminology for adult male lower urinary tract and pelvic floor symptoms and dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2019;38(2):433–477. doi: 10.1002/nau.23897. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DuBeau C, Simon SE, Morris JN. Impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:1325–1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00861.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schumpf L, Theill N, Scheiner DA, Fink D, Riese F, Betschart C, et al. Urinary incontinence and its association with functional, physical and cognitive health among female nursing home residents in Switzerland. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:17. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0414-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rait G, Fletcher A, Smeeth L, Brayne C, Stirling S, Nunes M, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment: results from the MRC trial of assessment and management of older people in the community. Age Ageing. 2005;34(3):242–248. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibson W, Hunter KF, Camicioli R, Booth J, Skelton DA, Dumoulin C, et al. The association between lower urinary tract syptoms and falls: forming a theoretical model for a research agenda. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):501–509. doi: 10.1002/nau.23295. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources