Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030984.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030984.

Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review

Peter Lee  1 , Ken Chin  1   2 , Danny Liew  1 , Dion Stub  1   3 , Angela L Brennan  1 , Jeffrey Lefkovits  1   4 , Ella Zomer  5
Affiliations

Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review

Peter Lee et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to examine the existing evidence base for the cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit of clinical quality registries (CQRs).

Design: Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Data sources: Nine electronic bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, in the period from January 2000 to August 2019.

Eligibility criteria: Any peer-reviewed published study or grey literature in English which had reported on an economic evaluation of one or more CQRs.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were screened, extracted and appraised by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was performed around key attributes of each CQR and on key patient outcomes or changes to healthcare processes or utilisation. A narrative synthesis of the cost-effectiveness associated with CQRs was also conducted. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness, in terms of the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), cost savings or return-on-investment (ROI) attributed to CQR implementation.

Results: Three studies and one government report met the inclusion criteria for the review. A study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme (NSQIP) in the USA found that the cost-effectiveness of this registry improved over time, based on an ICER of US$8312 per postoperative event avoided. A separate study in Canada estimated the ROI to be US$3.43 per US$1.00 invested in the NSQIP. An evaluation of a post-splenectomy CQR in Australia estimated that registry cost-effectiveness improved from US$234 329 to US$18 358 per life year gained when considering the benefits accrued over the lifetime of the population. The government report evaluating five Australian CQRs estimated an overall return of 1.6-5.5 times the cost of investment.

Conclusions: Available data indicate that CQRs can be cost-effective and can lead to significant returns on investment. It is clear that further studies that evaluate the economic and clinical impacts of CQRs are necessary.

Prospero registration number: CRD42018116807.

Keywords: benchmarking; clinical quality registry; cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; health economics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: PL is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. DL has received honoraria or study grants from Abbvie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bohringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Shire. DS is supported by the National Heart Foundation Fellowship and Viertel Foundation Award. EZ has received study grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Shire.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Results of the search strategy. CQR, clinical quality registry.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Evans SM, Scott IA, Johnson NP, et al. . Development of clinical-quality registries in Australia: the way forward. Med J Aust 2011;194:360–3. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03007.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fonarow GC. Improving quality of care and outcomes for heart failure. -Role of registries-. Circ J 2011;75:1783–90. 10.1253/circj.cj-11-0582 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glader E-L, Stegmayr B, Norrving B, et al. . Large variations in the use of oral anticoagulants in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation: a Swedish national perspective. J Intern Med 2004;255:22–32. 10.1046/j.0954-6820.2003.01253.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoque DME, Kumari V, Hoque M, et al. . Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One 2017;12:e0183667 10.1371/journal.pone.0183667 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilcox N, McNeil JJ. Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care. Med J Aust 2016;205:S27–9. 10.5694/mja15.00921 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources