Terminology and assessment tools of psychosis: A systematic narrative review
- PMID: 31846133
- DOI: 10.1111/pcn.12966
Terminology and assessment tools of psychosis: A systematic narrative review
Abstract
Aim: Phenomena within the psychosis continuum that varies in frequency/duration/intensity have been increasingly identified. Different terms describe these phenomena, however there is no standardization within the terminology. This review evaluated the definitions and assessment tools of seven terms - (i) 'psychotic experiences'; (ii) 'psychotic-like experiences'; (iii) 'psychotic-like symptoms'; (iv) 'attenuated psychotic symptoms'; (v) 'prodromal psychotic symptoms'; (vi) 'psychotic symptomatology'; and (vii) 'psychotic symptoms'.
Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were searched during February-March 2019. Inclusion criteria included 1989-2019, full text, human, and English. Papers with no explicit definition or assessment tool, duplicates, conference abstracts, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or no access were excluded.
Results: A total of 2238 papers were identified and of these, 627 were included. Definitions and assessment tools varied, but some trends were found. Psychotic experiences and psychotic-like experiences were transient and mild, found in the general population and those at-risk. Psychotic-like symptoms were subthreshold and among at-risk populations and non-psychotic mental disorders. Attenuated psychotic symptoms were subthreshold but associated with distress, risk, and help-seeking. Prodromal psychotic symptoms referred to the prodrome of psychotic disorders. Psychotic symptomatology included delusions and hallucinations within psychotic disorders. Psychotic symptoms was the broadest term, encompassing a range of populations but most commonly involving hallucinations, delusions, thought disorder, and disorganization.
Discussion: A model for conceptualizing the required terms is proposed and future directions needed to advance this field of research are discussed.
Keywords: psychiatry; psychology; psychotic disorders; schizophrenia; terminology.
© 2019 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences © 2019 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.
References
-
- Yung AR, McGorry PD, McFarlane CA, Jackson HJ, Patton GC, Rakkar A. Monitoring and Care of Young People at incipient risk of psychosis. Schizophr. Bull. 1996; 22: 283-303.
-
- Navarro-Mateu F, Alonso J, Lim CCW, Saha S et al. The association between psychotic experiences and disability: Results from the WHO world mental health surveys. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2017; 136: 74-84.
-
- Hans O, DeVylder JE, Fang-pei C. To treat or not to treat: Responding to psychotic experiences. Br. J. Soc. Work. 2015; 45: 2003-2019.
-
- Pries LK, Guloksuz S, Ten Have M et al. Evidence that environmental and familial risks for psychosis additively impact a multidimensional subthreshold psychosis syndrome. Schizophr. Bull. 2018; 44: 710-719.
-
- Ross RG, Schaeffer J, Compagnon N, Heinlein S, Beresford C, Farley G. Creating school-age versions of Semistructured interviews for the Prodrome to schizophrenia: Lessons from case reviews. Schizophr. Bull. 2003; 29: 729-735.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical