Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 14;16(24):5112.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245112.

Black Women's Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Affiliations

Black Women's Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Arnethea L Sutton et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Black women at-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) continue to underutilize genetic counseling and testing (GCT). One reason for this disparity is a fear of discrimination from insurance companies if identified as high-risk. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was enacted to protect against this type of discrimination; however, Black women's levels of confidence in this law are unknown. In this descriptive study, we sought to (1) assess Black women's confidence in the GINA law and (2) identify multilevel factors related to their confidence in GINA. Ninety-four Black women at-risk of HBOC completed surveys that assessed intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural factors. Multiple regression analysis determined factors associated with confidence in GINA. Most women were ≤50 years of age (66.0%) and about half never had a cancer diagnosis (51.1%). Confidence in GINA was moderate (mean = 10.67; standard deviation = 2.54; range = 5-15). Women who valued GCT reported more confidence in GINA (β = 0.345; CI 0.017 to 0.673; p = 0.040). Lack of confidence in GINA may serve as a barrier to seeking GCT. Efforts to increase the perceived value of GCT among Black women could be benefited by increasing awareness of national efforts towards privacy protections of genetic information.

Keywords: Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; black women; genetic counseling and testing; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of women’s confidence in GINA.

References

    1. DeSantis C.E., Ma J., Goding Sauer A., Newman L.A., Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017;67:439–448. doi: 10.3322/caac.21412. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dietze E.C., Chavez T.A., Seewaldt V.L. Obesity and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Disparities, Controversies, and Biology. Am. J. Pathol. 2018;188:280–290. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.09.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietze E.C., Sistrunk C., Miranda-Carboni G., O’Regan R., Seewaldt V.L. Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: Disparities versus biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:248–254. doi: 10.1038/nrc3896. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keegan T.H.M., Kurian A.W., Gali K., Tao L., Lichtensztajn D.Y., Hershman D.L., Habel L.A., Caan B.J., Gomez S.L. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic differences in short-term breast cancer survival among women in an integrated health system. Am. J. Public Health. 2015;105:938–946. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lessick M. Genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial considerations. Nurs. Women’s Health. 2007;11:390–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-486X.2007.00204.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts