Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 26;70(690):e9-e19.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707105. Print 2020 Jan.

Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care

Ola Markiewicz  1 , Mary Lavelle  1 , Fabiana Lorencatto  2 , Gaby Judah  1 , Hutan Ashrafian  1 , Ara Darzi  1
Affiliations
Review

Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care

Ola Markiewicz et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Transitions between healthcare settings are vulnerable points for patients.

Aim: To identify key threats to safe patient transitions from hospital to primary care settings.

Design and setting: Three-round web-based Delphi consensus process among clinical and non-clinical staff from 39 primary care practices in North West London, England.

Method: Round 1 was a free-text idea-generating round. Rounds 2 and 3 were consensus-obtaining rating rounds. Practices were encouraged to complete the questionnaires at team meetings. Aggregate ratings of perceived level of importance for each threat were calculated (1-3: 'not important', 4-6: 'somewhat important', 7-9: 'very important'). Percentage of votes cast for each patient or medication group were recorded; consensus was defined as ≥75%.

Results: A total of 39 practices completed round 1, 36/39 (92%) completed round 2, and 30/36 (83%) completed round 3. Round 1 identified nine threats encompassing problems involving communication, service organisation, medication provision, and patients who were most at risk. 'Poor quality of handover instructions from secondary to primary care teams' achieved the highest rating (mean rating at round 3 = 8.43) and a 100% consensus that it was a 'very important' threat. Older individuals (97%) and patients with complex medical problems taking >5 medications (80%) were voted the most vulnerable. Anticoagulants (77%) were considered to pose the greatest risk to patients.

Conclusion: This study identified specific threats to safe patient transitions from hospital to primary care, providing policymakers and healthcare providers with targets for quality improvement strategies. Further work would need to identify factors underpinning these threats so that interventions can be tailored to the relevant behavioural and environmental contexts in which these threats arise.

Keywords: communication; patient discharge; patient handover; transition of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The Delphi process and study outline. CRN = clinical research network. NW = North West. PCP = primary care practices.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital. CMAJ. 2004;170(3):345–349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheah LP, Amott DH, Pollard J, Watters DA. Electronic medical handover: towards safer medical care. Med J Aust. 2005;183(7):369–372. - PubMed
    1. Simpson KR. Handling handoffs safely. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005;30(2):152. - PubMed
    1. Kostopoulou O, Delaney B. Confidential reporting of patient safety events in primary care: results from a multilevel classification of cognitive and system factors. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(2):95–100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clare J, Hofmeyer A. Discharge planning and continuity of care for aged people: indicators of satisfaction and implications for practice. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998;16(1):7–13. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms