Integrating complex systems science into road safety research and practice, Part 2: applying systems tools to the problem of increasing pedestrian death rates
- PMID: 31848213
- PMCID: PMC8126266
- DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043316
Integrating complex systems science into road safety research and practice, Part 2: applying systems tools to the problem of increasing pedestrian death rates
Abstract
Objectives: To provide a specific example of how systems dynamics tools can increase understanding of stakeholder 'mental models' and generate robust systems-based hypotheses about the escalating problem of rising pedestrian death rates in the USA.
Methods: We designed and facilitated two group model building (GMB) workshops. Participants generated causal loop diagrams (CLDs) individually and in small groups to explore hypotheses concerning time-dynamic interacting factors underlying the increasing rates of pedestrian deaths. Using a grounded theory approach, research team members synthesised the structures and hypotheses into a single CLD.
Results: CLDs from the 41 participants indicated four core factors hypothesised to have a direct impact on pedestrian fatalities: pedestrian-vehicle crashes, vehicle speed at the time of the crash, vehicle size/dimensions and emergency response time. Participants diagrammed how actions and reactions impacted these proximal factors over time and led to ripple effects throughout a larger system to generate an increase in pedestrian deaths. Hypothesised contributing mechanisms fell within the following broad categories: community responses; research, policy and industry influence; potential unintended consequences of responses to pedestrian deaths; and the role of sprawl.
Conclusions: This application of systems science tools suggested several strategies for advancing injury prevention research and practice. The project generated robust hypotheses and advanced stakeholder communication and depth of understanding and engagement in this key issue. The CLD and GMB process detailed in this study provides a concrete example of how systems tools can be adopted and applied to a transportation safety topic.
Keywords: injury prevention; pedestrian; road safety; system dynamics; systems science.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: No, there are no competing interests for any author.
Figures




References
-
- Sterman J Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 2000.
-
- Hovmand PS. Chapter 2: Group Model Building and Community-based System Dynamics Process In: Community Based System Dynamics. New York, NY: Spring Science & Business Media, 2014.
-
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Fatality Analysis Reporting System. Washington, DC: NHTSA, 2019.
-
- Govenors Highway Safety Association. Pedestrian Traffic Fatalities by State. Govenors Highway Safety Association Report. 2019.
-
- Hu W, Cicchino JB. An examination of the increases in pedestrian motor vehicle crash fatalities during 2009–16. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Report. 2018. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources