Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 17;9(1):19278.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55822-3.

Sperm quality and quantity evolve through different selective processes in the Phasianidae

Affiliations

Sperm quality and quantity evolve through different selective processes in the Phasianidae

Wen Bo Liao et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Sperm competition is often considered the primary selective force underlying the rapid and diversifying evolution of ejaculate traits. Yet, several recent studies have drawn attention to other forms of selection with the potential of exceeding the effects of sperm competition. Since ejaculates are complex, multivariate traits, it seems plausible that different ejaculate components vary in their responses to different selective pressures. Such information, however, is generally lacking as individual ejaculate traits tend to be studied in isolation. Here, we studied the macroevolutionary patterns of ejaculate volume, sperm number, sperm length and the proportion of viable normal sperm in response to varying levels of sperm competition, body size and the duration of female sperm storage in pheasants and allies (Phasianidae). Ejaculate volume, sperm number and sperm viability were all relatively higher in polygamous than in monogamous mating systems. However, whereas ejaculate volume additionally covaried with body size, sperm number instead increased with the female sperm-storage duration, in conjunction with a decrease in sperm length. Overall, our results revealed important details on how different forms of selection can jointly shape ejaculates as complex, composite traits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical representation of the results of Table 1, showing the response of four ejaculate traits to (left) the social mating system as a proxy of sperm competition and (right) either the female egg-laying period or body mass. The left-hand panels depict the least-squares means with 95% confidence intervals, after controlling for body mass and the female egg-laying period (numbers at the bottom of each panel indicate sample sizes). The right-hand panels show the partial regressions derived from the same models, controlling for body mass and the social mating system on both axes. The labelled data point in panel B indicates Dendragapus obscurus, the removal of which considerably strengthened the negative relationship (see text and Table 1). The proportion of viable normal sperm was arcsine-square-root transformed and then converted to percentages by multiplying by 180/π. Total sperm length was measured in μm, ejaculate volume in μl, and total sperm number in millions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical representation of the response of the relative sperm investment, ln(sperm length/sperm number), to (A) the social mating system as a proxy of sperm competition and (B) the female egg-laying period. (A) depicts the least-squares means with 95% confidence intervals and sample sizes, after controlling for the female egg-laying period and body mass. (B) shows the partial regression derived from the same model, controlling for body mass and the social mating system on both axes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pairwise correlations between three ejaculate traits. The proportion of viable normal sperm was arcsine-square-root transformed and then converted to percentages by multiplying by 180/π. Total sperm length and total sperm number were quantified in μm and millions, respectively.

References

    1. Orr TJ, Brennan PLR. Sperm storage: Distinguishing selective processes and evaluating criteria. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2015;30:261–272. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Birkhead TR, Møller AP. Sexual selection and the temporal separation of reproductive events: sperm storage data from reptiles, birds and mammals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1993;50:295–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00933.x. - DOI
    1. Orr TJ, Zuk M. Reproductive delays in mammals: An unexplored avenue for post-copulatory sexual selection. Biol. Rev. 2014;89:889–912. doi: 10.1111/brv.12085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parker GA. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 1970;45:526–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x. - DOI
    1. Eberhard, W. G. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. (Princeton University Press, 1996).

Publication types