Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 18;22(1):178-193.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz155.

Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis

Affiliations
Review

Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis

Richa Bharti et al. Brief Bioinform. .

Abstract

Analyzing the microbiome of diverse species and environments using next-generation sequencing techniques has significantly enhanced our understanding on metabolic, physiological and ecological roles of environmental microorganisms. However, the analysis of the microbiome is affected by experimental conditions (e.g. sequencing errors and genomic repeats) and computationally intensive and cumbersome downstream analysis (e.g. quality control, assembly, binning and statistical analyses). Moreover, the introduction of new sequencing technologies and protocols led to a flood of new methodologies, which also have an immediate effect on the results of the analyses. The aim of this work is to review the most important workflows for 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun and long-read metagenomics, as well as to provide best-practice protocols on experimental design, sample processing, sequencing, assembly, binning, annotation and visualization. To simplify and standardize the computational analysis, we provide a set of best-practice workflows for 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing data (available at https://github.com/grimmlab/MicrobiomeBestPracticeReview).

Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; amplicon sequencing; assembly; functional and taxonomic classification; metagenomics; microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of targeted amplicon and metagenomic sequencing approaches. A schematic overview demonstrating diverse sample types along with commonly utilized sequencing platforms, as well as systematic and stepwise data processing steps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A schematic overview outlining various experimental and computational challenges associated with 16S rRNA-based and shotgun metagenomic sequencing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Major short-read and long-read sequencing technologies. (A) Illumina sequencing involves initial trimming, adenylation of the blunt ends and ligation of specific adapters to DNA molecules. Following this library, fragments are amplified in situ on flow cell surfaces through bridge amplification and produce sequencing clusters. Finally, reversible dye terminator sequencing step is implemented where single-nucleotide addition reactions and presence of blocking group at the 3′-OH (of the ribose moiety) help to identify sequencing clusters through a reporter fluorescent signal. (B) PacBio sequencing involves a circular consensus sequencing (CCS) SMRTbell technique. Herein, ligation of hairpin adapters to each end of a duplex DNA molecule forms a closed loop, which is sequenced in a zero-mode waveguide (ZMW), fluorescence-based readout of nucleotide incorporation. Each strand in the duplex DNA is sequenced together in multiple passes, and the consensus sequences from both strands are incorporated. (C) Nanopore sequencing involves ligation of hairpin adapters at one end of duplex DNA molecule before initiating nanopore sequencing of the linked original DNA strands. The blockades in ionic current through the nanopore are optimally quantified as DNA base sequences.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Best-practice protocol for the acquisition and analysis of targeted amplicon and shotgun metagenomics data from sequencing to functional annotation. The basic flow of experimental steps followed by downstream preprocessing and analysis steps is shown. At each step, the optimal tools utilized during the process are shown as well. All scripts are available at https://github.com/grimmlab/MicrobiomeBestPracticeReview.

References

    1. Reese AT, Dunn RR. Drivers of microbiome biodiversity: a review of general rules, feces, and ignorance. MBio 2018;9:e01294-18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, et al. The human microbiome project. Nature 2007;449:804–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamada N, Seo SU, Chen GY, et al. Role of the gut microbiota in immunity and inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2013;13:321–35. - PubMed
    1. Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, et al. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 2013;11:789–99. - PubMed
    1. Zilber-Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E. Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2008;32:723–35. - PubMed

Substances