Learning from registries in pulmonary arterial hypertension: pitfalls and recommendations
- PMID: 31852746
- PMCID: PMC9488628
- DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0050-2019
Learning from registries in pulmonary arterial hypertension: pitfalls and recommendations
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and incurable chronic disease characterised by a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and right heart failure. Patient registries collecting observational data can be of great value in the understanding of clinical problems. While clinical trials provide data in selected patient populations, registries better depict real-life practice. This review aims to reflect the input of patient registries in the general knowledge of the disease. Advances in epidemiology of the different subgroups, including data on incidence and/or prevalence, increasing age at presentation and stagnating diagnostic delay are reported. The importance of haemodynamic definition criteria and cardiac comorbidities are underscored. The review also shows the major transformation that pulmonary arterial hypertension therapeutic management has undergone, with still insufficient use of combination therapies; consecutive improvement in outcome; upcoming evidence in disfavour of anticoagulation; and validity of the available risk-stratification tools derived from large registries. Product registries are also briefly presented. Finally, the benefits of registries and methodological aspects are discussed, including immortal time bias, registry data quality and recommendations from EU organisations (EUCERD and PARENT).
Copyright ©ERS 2019.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: K. Swinnen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Quarck has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Godinas reports personal fees from Actelion and MSD, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Belge reports personal fees from Actelion and Bayer, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Delcroix reports grants and personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Bayer, GSK, MSD, Reata, Bellerophon and Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work.
Figures
Comment in
- doi: 10.1183/16000617.0128-2019
References
-
- McGoon MD, Benza RL, Escribano-Subias P, et al. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: epidemiology and registries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: Suppl. 25, D51–D59. - PubMed
-
- Gliklich RE, Leavy MB, Karl J, et al. A framework for creating standardized outcome measures for patient registries. J Comp Eff Res 2014; 3: 473–480. - PubMed
-
- Rich S, Dantzker DR, Ayres SM, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension. A national prospective study. Ann Intern Med 1987; 107: 216–223. - PubMed
-
- Rådegran G, Kjellström B, Ekmehag B, et al. Characteristics and survival of adult Swedish PAH and CTEPH patients 2000–2014. Scand Cardiovasc J SCJ 2016; 50: 243–250. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources