Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):801-808.
doi: 10.5551/jat.51359. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Assessing the Risk for Development of Deep Vein Thrombosis among Chinese Patients using the 2010 Caprini Risk Assessment Model: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Assessing the Risk for Development of Deep Vein Thrombosis among Chinese Patients using the 2010 Caprini Risk Assessment Model: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Haixin Bo et al. J Atheroscler Thromb. .

Abstract

Aim: We sought to validate the 2010 Caprini risk assessment model (RAM) in risk stratification for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis among Chinese bedridden patients.

Methods: We performed a prospective study in 25 hospitals in China over 9 months. Patients were risk-stratified using the 2010 Caprini RAM.

Results: We included a total 24,524 patients. Fresh DVT was found in 221 patients, with overall incidence of DVT 0.9%. We found a correlation of DVT incidence with Caprini score according to risk stratification (χ2 =196.308, P<0.001). Patients in the low-risk and moderate-risk groups had DVT incidence <0.5%. More than half of patients with DVT were in the highest risk group. Compared with the low-risk group, risk was 2.10-fold greater in the moderate-risk group, 3.34-fold greater in the high-risk group, and 16.12-fold greater in the highest-risk group with Caprini scores ≥ 9. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.78; P<0.01) for all patients. A Caprini score of ≥ 5 points was considered the criterion of a reliably increased risk of DVT in surgical patients with standard thromboprophylaxis. Predicting DVT using a cumulative risk score ≥ 4 is recommended for nonsurgical patients.

Conclusions: Our study suggested that the 2010 Caprini RAM can be effectively used to stratify hospitalized Chinese patients into DVT risk categories, based on individual risk factors. Classification of the highest risk levels using a cumulative risk score ≥ 4 and ≥ 5 provides significantly greater clinical information in nonsurgical and surgical patients, respectively.

Keywords: Caprini risk assessment model; Deep venous thrombosis; Risk stratification; Validation study; Venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Caprini scores and incidence rates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of Caprini scores for all patients AUC, area under the ROC curve.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for surgical patients and nonsurgical patients AUC, area under the ROC curve.

References

    1. Lee WS, Kim KI, Lee HJ, Kyung HS, Seo SS: The incidence of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis after knee arthroplasty in Asians remains low: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013; 471: 1523-1532 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angchaisuksiri P: Venous thromboembolism in Asia--an unrecognised and under-treated problem? Thromb Haemost, 2011; 106: 585-590 - PubMed
    1. Aggarwal A, Fullam L, Brownstein AP, Maynard GA, Ansell J, Varga EA, Friedman RJ, Rickles FR: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE): awareness and prophylaxis practices reported by patients with cancer. Cancer Invest, 2015; 33: 405-410 - PubMed
    1. Caprini JA: Thrombosis risk assessment as a guide to quality patient care. Dis Mon, 2005; 51: 70-78 - PubMed
    1. Caprini JA: Risk assessment as a guide for the prevention of the many faces of venous thromboembolism. Am J Surg, 2010; 199: S3-10 - PubMed

Publication types