Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Apr:56:63-72.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

Pharmacological interventions to reduce edema following cardiopulmonary bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Pharmacological interventions to reduce edema following cardiopulmonary bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nicole A M Dekker et al. J Crit Care. 2020 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of different types of pharmacological agents to reduce organ specific edema following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods: Pubmed, Embase.com and Cochrane were searched for studies administrating a pharmacological agent before CPB. Primary outcome was postoperative edema.

Results: Forty-four studies (clinical n = 6, preclinical n = 38) fulfilled eligibility criteria. Steroids were used in most clinical studies (n = 5, 83%) and reduced postoperative edema in 4 studies, however heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. In preclinical studies, a total of 31 different drugs were tested of which 20 (65%) reduced edema in at least one organ. Particularly neutrophil inhibitors, and modulators of coagulation or endothelial barrier reduced pulmonary edema (SMD -2.77 [-3.93, -1.61]; -1.29 [-2.12, -0.46], -2.33 [-4.69, 0.03], respectively) compared to no treatment. Reducing renal (SMD -0.91 [CI -1.65 to -0.18]), intestinal (SMD -1.98 [CI -3.92 to -0.04]) or myocardial (SMD -1.95 [CI -3.91 to -0.01]) edema following CPB required specific modulators of endothelial barrier.

Conclusion: Overall, neutrophil inhibitors and direct modulators of endothelial barrier (PAR1, Tie2 signaling) most effectively reduced edema following CPB, in particular pulmonary edema. Future research should focus on a combination of these strategies to reduce edema and assess the effect on organ function and outcome following CPB.

Keywords: Capillary permeability; Cardiac surgery; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Edema; Endothelium; Vascular leakage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None declared.

Publication types