Liposomal Irinotecan + 5-FU/LV in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of Patient, Tumor, and Previous Treatment Characteristics in the Pivotal NAPOLI-1 Trial
- PMID: 31856081
- PMCID: PMC6946097
- DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001455
Liposomal Irinotecan + 5-FU/LV in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of Patient, Tumor, and Previous Treatment Characteristics in the Pivotal NAPOLI-1 Trial
Erratum in
-
Liposomal Irinotecan + 5-FU/LV in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Subgroup Analyses of Patient, Tumor, and Previous Treatment Characteristics in the Pivotal NAPOLI-1 Trial: Erratum.Pancreas. 2020 Mar;49(3):e27. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001517. Pancreas. 2020. PMID: 32168258 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objectives: The NAnoliPOsomaL Irinotecan (NAPOLI-1) study (NCT01494506) was the largest global phase 3 study in a post-gemcitabine metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) population (N = 417). The subanalyses reported here investigated the prognostic effect of tumor characteristics and disease stage, prior treatment characteristics, baseline patient characteristics on survival outcomes in NAPOLI-1, and whether liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) benefited patients with mPAC across subgroups.
Methods: Post hoc analyses were performed in the NAPOLI-1 population (4 across tumor characteristics and disease stage, 6 across prior treatment characteristics, and 4 across patient baseline characteristics). Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and patient safety data were evaluated.
Results: Mortality and morbidity risk was lower on nal-IRI+5-FU/LV treatment across subgroups. Exceptions were patients who had received prior nonliposomal irinotecan and those who had undergone prior Whipple procedure (overall survival hazard ratio = 1.25 and 1.23, respectively). Decreased appetite, liver metastases, and number of measurable metastatic lesions seemed to be prognostic of survival in this population. Subgroup safety data were generally comparable with those in the overall NAPOLI-1 safety population.
Conclusions: A diverse population of patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy benefited from nal-IRI+5-FU/LV versus 5-FU/LV, potentially helping guide treatment decisions for challenging cases.
Conflict of interest statement
T.M.M. reports advisor roles for Shire, Servier, Celgene, Amgen, Incyte, Astra-Zeneca, and Sanofi. L.-T.C. reports an advisor role for ONO, Bristol Myers-Squibb, MSD, Eli Lilly, PhamaEngine, Five Prime, Novartis, and Astra Zeneca; honoraria from ONO, BMS, MSD, Eli Lilly, PhamaEngine, TTY, SyncoreBio, Five Prime, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, and Ipsen; and research funding from Novartis, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Polaris, TTY, SyncoreBio, and Celgene. J.T.S. reports an advisor role for Baxalta (now part of Shire), Celgene, Roche, and Shire; honoraria from Shire and Celgene; and research funding from 4SC, Celgene, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Roche. D.C. reports research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celgene, Merrimack, Medimmune, Merck Serono, and Sanofi. G.B. reports honoraria received from Servier, Roche, Bayer, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, and Lilly and advisor role for Bayer, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, Taiho, and Nordic. J.-F.B. reports an advisor role for Baxalta (now part of Shire) and Shire. A.D. reports honoraria received from Specialised Therapeutics Australia and consultant/advisor roles for Baxalta (now part of Shire) and Celgene. B.B. was employed by Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc, at the time of the study, and is currently an employee at Ipsen Bioscience, Inc, A.W.-G. reports consultant/advisor roles for Merrimack, Pfizer, Newlink Genetics, Ipsen, and Jacobio and research funding from Newlink Genetics, Precision Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Aduro Biotech, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Halozyme, Oncomed, CTI, Lilly, Abbvie, Plexxikon, Verastem, Merck, and BioMed Vally Discoveries. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
-
- Fest J, Ruiter R, van Rooij FJ, et al. Underestimation of pancreatic cancer in the national cancer registry - reconsidering the incidence and survival rates. Eur J Cancer. 2017;72:186–191. - PubMed
-
- Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2017, with focus on lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1117–1123. - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:356–387. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical