Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216
- PMID: 31856124
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003606
Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216
Abstract
Suspected macrosomia is encountered commonly in obstetric practice. As birth weight increases, the likelihood of labor abnormalities, shoulder dystocia, birth trauma, and permanent injury to the newborn increases. The purpose of this document is to quantify those risks, address the accuracy and limitations of methods for estimating fetal weight, and suggest clinical management for a pregnancy with suspected macrosomia. This document has been revised to include recent literature and updated information on the prevention of macrosomia.
References
-
- Duryea EL, Hawkins JS, McIntire DD, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. A revised birth weight reference for the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:16–22. (Level II-3)
-
- Nesbitt TS, Gilbert WM, Herrchen B. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:476–80. (Level II-3)
-
- Boulet SL, Alexander GR, Salihu HM, Pass M. Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1372–8. (Level II-3)
-
- Zhang X, Decker A, Platt RW, Kramer MS. How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:517.e1–6. (Level II-3)
-
- Doty MS, Chen HY, Sibai BM, Chauhan SP. Maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with early term delivery of large-for-gestational-age but nonmacrosomic neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:1160–6. (Level II-2)
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials