Patient and carer survey of remote vital sign telemonitoring for self-management of long-term conditions
- PMID: 31857341
- PMCID: PMC7252976
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100079
Patient and carer survey of remote vital sign telemonitoring for self-management of long-term conditions
Abstract
Background: Home-based self-monitoring has failed to show intended savings to healthcare budgets yet it continues to emerge and gain popularity.
Objective: We set out to verify stakeholders' perspectives of remote vital sign telemonitoring.
Design: An observational design was adopted by devising a survey for distribution to service users and their informal carers.
Sample: Service users in South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust were included. A total of 274 questionnaires were issued. Data from 97 patients (35% response rate) and 49 carers were analysed. Of these, 81 patients and 48 of their carers experienced a monitoring service known as TF3 and 16 patients and 1 carer experienced a service known as U-Tell. The cohorts comprised people living with a number of long-term conditions: diabetes, hypertension after stroke, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, bronchiectasis and those requiring anticoagulation using warfarin.
Results: Analysis showed that respondents were supportive of the technology with 90.7% of patients agreeing or strongly agreeing with the statement: the remote monitoring system assisted me in managing my health on a day-to-day basis. The patients liked the technology largely because it provided empowerment and control for self-management and allowed them to continue with their lives without major disruption. These views were independent of the technology used and not associated with the patient's long-term conditions, gender or age. There were no reported adverse incidents.
Conclusion: As self-monitoring becomes more relevant to healthcare delivery, the technology will be accepted by many in the population with long-term conditions.
Keywords: BMJ Health Informatics; healthcare.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- WHO Global action plan for prevention and control of noncommunicable disease 2013-2020. World Health organisation, 2013. Available: https://www.who.int/nmh/events/ncd_action_plan/en/ [Accessed Oct 2019].
-
- GOLD Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (updated 2014). global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease, 2014. Available: www.goldcopd.org [Accessed Oct 2019]. - PubMed
-
- Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, et al. . Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effect on professional practice and health care outcomes (review). The Cochrane Collaboration 2010. - PubMed
-
- McClean S, Nurmatov U, Lui JLY, et al. . Telecare for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (review). The Cochrane collaboration and published in the Cochrane library 2011, issue 7. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011.
-
- Steventon A, Bardsley M. The impact of telehealth on the use of hospital care and mortality (summary). Nuffield trust, 2012. Available: http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/120622_... [Accessed Oct 2019].
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials