Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;60(2):162-168.
doi: 10.1007/s00117-019-00629-6.

[Analysis of documented informed consent forms for computed tomography : Completeness and data quality in four clinics]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Analysis of documented informed consent forms for computed tomography : Completeness and data quality in four clinics]

[Article in German]
D Vogele et al. Radiologe. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Before performing a medical procedure, such as a computed tomography, an obligatory informed consent of the patient and its detailed documentation is necessary.

Methods: A total of 1424 informed consent forms for contrast-enhanced computed tomography from four clinics with different healthcare levels were analyzed. Informed consent forms were evaluated related to completeness, legibility and quality.

Results: In all, 1110 (77.9%) informed consent forms were sufficiently completed, 267 patients (18.8%) answered the form incompletely and 47 patients (3.3%) returned it without answering a question. Handwritten comments were found in 1391 (97.7%) cases. Thereof, 1329 (93.3%) were graded as detailed comments and 62 (4.4%) as less detailed comments. These comments were well legible in 675 (47.4%) cases, 558 (39.2%) informed consents showed limited legibility and in 158 (11.1%) more than 50% of the comments were unreadable. Signatures were complete in 1374 (96.5%) informed consent forms.

Conclusion: The results show a better quality and documentation of informed consent forms for computed tomography obtained by radiology residents compared to radiological specialists. Compared to the radiologists, the non-radiologists performed significantly worse. The establishment of videos and use of digital informed consent forms could provide a possible solution.

Keywords: Documentation; Handwritten comments; Legibility; Patient briefing; Signature.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J R Soc Med. 2002 Nov;95(11):545-6 - PubMed
    1. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Jun;26(3):383-92 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1996 Dec 21-28;313(7072):1657-8 - PubMed
    1. Radiologe. 2006 Jul;46(7):557-66 - PubMed
    1. Rofo. 2016 Mar;188(3):312-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources