Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;14(2):114-134.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00828-z. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies

Affiliations
Review

Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies

Phyllis Butow et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: Returning to work (RTW) after cancer treatment can be challenging, but when desired, has many benefits. While there are many qualitative studies (reviews and recent studies) available on cancer survivors' experience of returning to work, synthesis of these qualitative studies is lacking. We aimed to summarise the existing qualitative reviews and recent studies following the last published review, to examine cancer survivors' motivations for and experiences of RTW, and to highlight factors within both the survivors and his or her environment that influence RTW.

Method: A set of systematic reviews focusing on RTW were identified. A systematic search for individual papers published on RTW since the last review was also completed. Data extraction and bias assessment were conducted, with 25% double-coded to ensure reliability. A meta-ethnographic approach was utilised to synthesise the findings of each.

Results: Seven systematic reviews and 12 individual papers between 2017 and 2019 were identified. Quality was variable. Most reviews and studies focused on women with breast cancer. Three major themes were identified: person factors, employment factors and wider contextual factors including family, social and cultural variables.

Conclusions: We identified gaps in research on the RTW experiences of people with cancers other than breast, men, those with low incomes and more diverse populations.

Implications for cancer survivors: Cancer survivors need to consider personal, employer and wider contextual factors when deciding whether and when to RTW. Future interventions to support survivors should be informed by these findings, addressing the diverse range of potential factors related to RTW in an individual survivor.

Keywords: Cancer survivors; Meta-review; Qualitative; Return to work; Synthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Cancer Surviv. 2014 Dec;8(4):657-70 - PubMed
    1. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jun;40(11):1252-1258 - PubMed
    1. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2017 Mar-Apr;35(2):180-201 - PubMed
    1. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Sep 08;24(1):32 - PubMed
    1. J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Dec;4(4):415-37 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources