PET/CT and the Response to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer
- PMID: 31858908
- PMCID: PMC8206188
- DOI: 10.2174/1874471013666191220105449
PET/CT and the Response to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer
Abstract
Objective: In recent years, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has significantly changed the outcome of patients affected by lung cancer and cutaneous melanoma. Although the clinical advantages, the selection of patients and the evaluation of response to immunotherapy remain unclear, the immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (irRECIST) was proposed as an update of the RECIST criteria for the assessment of response to immunotherapy. However, morphological images cannot predict early response to therapy that represents a challenge in clinical practice. 18F-FDG PET/CT before and after immunotherapy has an indeterminate role, demonstrating ambiguous results due to inflammatory effects secondary to activation of the immune system. The aim of the present review was to analyze the role of PET/CT as a guide for immunotherapy, by analyzing the current status and future perspectives.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in order to select all papers that discussed the role of PET/CT with FDG or other tracers in the evaluation or prediction of response to immunotherapy in lung cancer patients.
Results: Many papers are now available. Many clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients. FDG PET/CT can be used for the prediction of response to immunotherapy, while its utility for the evaluation of response is not still clearly reported. Moreover, the standardization of FDG PET/CT interpretation is missing and different criteria, such as information, have been investigated until now.
Conclusion: The utility of FDG PET/CT for patients with lung cancer undergoing immunotherapies is still preliminary and not well addressed. New agents for PET are promising, but large clinical trials are mandatory.
Keywords: 18F-FDG; Immunotherapy; PET/CT; immunotherapy; lung cancer; response to therapy.
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.
Figures

Similar articles
-
The Role of PET/CT in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: State of Art.Curr Radiopharm. 2020;13(1):24-31. doi: 10.2174/1874471012666191015100106. Curr Radiopharm. 2020. PMID: 31749440 Review.
-
[18F]FDG PET immunotherapy radiomics signature (iRADIOMICS) predicts response of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab.Radiol Oncol. 2020 Jul 29;54(3):285-294. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0042. Radiol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32726293 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT Criteria for the Prediction of Therapy Response and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Ipilimumab and PD-1 Inhibitors.Clin Nucl Med. 2020 Mar;45(3):187-194. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002921. Clin Nucl Med. 2020. PMID: 31977479
-
Cancer immunotherapy is accompanied by distinct metabolic patterns in primary and secondary lymphoid organs observed by non-invasive in vivo18F-FDG-PET.Theranostics. 2020 Jan 1;10(2):925-937. doi: 10.7150/thno.35989. eCollection 2020. Theranostics. 2020. PMID: 31903160 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging in Therapy Response Assessment and Surveillance of Lung Cancer: Evidenced-based Review With Focus on the Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT.Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Nov;21(6):485-497. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jul 3. Clin Lung Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32723523 Review.
Cited by
-
DCE-CT parameters as new functional imaging biomarkers at baseline and during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with lung cancer - a feasibility study.Cancer Imaging. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00745-0. Cancer Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39135095 Free PMC article.
-
Tumor response assessment on imaging following immunotherapy.Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 25;12:982983. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.982983. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36387133 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced NSCLC: [18F]FDG PET/CT as a Troubleshooter in Treatment Response.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;11(9):1681. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091681. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34574022 Free PMC article.
-
Potentials of Non-Invasive 18F-FDG PET/CT in Immunotherapy Prediction for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Front Genet. 2022 Feb 4;12:810011. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.810011. eCollection 2021. Front Genet. 2022. PMID: 35186013 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Modern radiopharmaceuticals for lung cancer imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan: A systematic review.SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 28;8:2050312120961594. doi: 10.1177/2050312120961594. eCollection 2020. SAGE Open Med. 2020. PMID: 33062275 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Brahmer J., Reckamp K.L., Baas P., Crinò L., Eberhardt W.E., Poddubskaya E., Antonia S., Pluzanski A., Vokes E.E., Holgado E., Waterhouse D., Ready N., Gainor J., Arén Frontera O., Havel L., Steins M., Garassino M.C., Aerts J.G., Domine M., Paz-Ares L., Reck M., Baudelet C., Harbison C.T., Lestini B., Spigel D.R. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373(2):123–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Borghaei H., Paz-Ares L., Horn L., Spigel D.R., Steins M., Ready N.E., Chow L.Q., Vokes E.E., Felip E., Holgado E., Barlesi F., Kohlhäufl M., Arrieta O., Burgio M.A., Fayette J., Lena H., Poddubskaya E., Gerber D.E., Gettinger S.N., Rudin C.M., Rizvi N., Crinò L., Blumenschein G.R., Jr, Antonia S.J., Dorange C., Harbison C.T., Graf Finckenstein F., Brahmer J.R. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373(17):1627–1639. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hodi F.S.O.D.S., O’Day S.J., McDermott D.F., Weber R.W., Sosman J.A., Haanen J.B., Gonzalez R., Robert C., Schadendorf D., Hassel J.C., Akerley W., van den Eertwegh A.J., Lutzky J., Lorigan P., Vaubel J.M., Linette G.P., Hogg D., Ottensmeier C.H., Lebbé C., Peschel C., Quirt I., Clark J.I., Wolchok J.D., Weber J.S., Tian J., Yellin M.J., Nichol G.M., Hoos A., Urba W.J. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363(8):711–723. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Robert C., Long G.V., Brady B., Dutriaux C., Maio M., Mortier L., Hassel J.C., Rutkowski P., McNeil C., Kalinka-Warzocha E., Savage K.J., Hernberg M.M., Lebbé C., Charles J., Mihalcioiu C., Chiarion-Sileni V., Mauch C., Cognetti F., Arance A., Schmidt H., Schadendorf D., Gogas H., Lundgren-Eriksson L., Horak C., Sharkey B., Waxman I.M., Atkinson V., Ascierto P.A. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;372(4):320–330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical