Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr;17(4):450-456.
doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201909-672OC.

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Readmissions for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2006-2015

Affiliations

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and Readmissions for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2006-2015

Laura C Myers et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Rationale: In October 2012, the initial phase of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program imposed financial penalties on hospitals with higher-than-expected risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries with congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia. We hypothesized that these penalties may also be associated with decreased readmissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the general population before COPD became a target condition (October 2014).Objectives: To determine if implementation of the initial financial penalties for other conditions was associated with a decrease in hospital readmissions for COPD.Methods: We used population-level data to examine patients readmitted for any reason or for COPD within 30 days after an initial hospitalization for COPD. The data source was seven states in the State Inpatient Database. The preimplementation period included calendar years 2006 to 2012. The postimplementation period included 2013 to 2015. Using interrupted time series, the level change was examined, which reflected the difference between the expected and actual readmission rates in 2013. The difference in slopes between the pre- and postimplementation periods was also examined.Results: We identified 805,764 hospitalizations for COPD from 904 hospitals. Overall, 26% of patients had primary insurance other than Medicare. After the intervention, patients had lower rates of all-cause 30-day readmissions (level change, -0.93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.44% to -0.43%; P = 0.004), which was driven by fewer early readmissions (0-7 d). The postimplementation slope became positive; the difference in slopes was 0.39% (95% CI, 0.28% to 0.50%; P < 0.001). Patients also had lower rates of COPD-related readmissions (level decrease, -0.52%; 95% CI, -0.93% to -0.12%; P = 0.02), which was due to decreases in both early and late (8-30 d) readmissions. The postimplementation slope was negative; the difference in slopes was -0.21% (95% CI, -0.35% to -0.07%; P = 0.009).Conclusions: In patients with COPD and any insurance status, there was an association between the initial phase of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program and a decrease in both all-cause and COPD-related readmissions even before COPD became a target diagnosis. The large amount of money at risk to hospitals likely resulted in broad behavioral change. Future research is needed to test which levers can effectively reduce readmission rates for COPD.

Keywords: COPD; health policy; hospital readmissions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Interrupted time series of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease readmitted within 30 days for any reason. The dashed line represents when the financial penalties were implemented for congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia. The dots represent the actual readmission rate for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for the calendar year. Patients could be readmitted with any diagnosis. The solid line represents the line of best fit for the preimplementation period and postimplementation period. The level change at the time of the intervention was −0.93% (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.44% to −0.43%; P = 0.004). The postimplementation slope became positive. The change in slopes between the preimplementation period and postimplementation period was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.28% to 0.50%; P < 0.001). HRRP = Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Interrupted time series of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) readmitted within 30 days for COPD. The dashed line represents when the financial penalties were implemented for congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia. The dots represent the actual readmission rate for patients with COPD for the calendar year. Patients had to be readmitted for COPD. The solid line represents the line of best fit for the preimplementation period and postimplementation period. The level change at the time of the intervention was −0.52% (95% confidence interval [CI], −0.93% to −0.12%; P = 0.02). The postimplementation slope was negative. The change in slopes between the preimplementation period and postimplementation period was −0.21 (95% CI, −0.35 to −0.07; P = 0.009). HRRP = Hospital Readmission Reduction Program.

Comment in

References

    1. Ford ES. Hospital discharges, readmissions, and ED visits for COPD or bronchiectasis among US adults: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample 2001-2012 and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006-2011. Chest. 2015;147:989–998. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perera PN, Armstrong EP, Sherrill DL, Skrepnek GH. Acute exacerbations of COPD in the United States: inpatient burden and predictors of costs and mortality. COPD. 2012;9:131–141. - PubMed
    1. Shah T, Churpek MM, Coca Perraillon M, Konetzka RT. Understanding why patients with COPD get readmitted: a large national study to delineate the Medicare population for the readmissions penalty expansion. Chest. 2015;147:1219–1226. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goto T, Faridi MK, Camargo CA, Jr, Hasegawa K. Time-varying readmission diagnoses during 30 days after hospitalization for COPD exacerbation. Med Care. 2018;56:673–678. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Walraven C, Jennings A, Taljaard M, Dhalla I, English S, Mulpuru S, et al. Incidence of potentially avoidable urgent readmissions and their relation to all-cause urgent readmissions. CMAJ. 2011;183:E1067–E1072. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types