Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 17;16(24):5154.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245154.

Effects of Backpacks on Ground Reaction Forces in Children of Different Ages When Walking, Running, and Jumping

Affiliations

Effects of Backpacks on Ground Reaction Forces in Children of Different Ages When Walking, Running, and Jumping

João P Barbosa et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Backpacks for transporting school loads are heavily utilized by children, and their mechanical advantages have been allowing children to transport heavy loads. These heavy loads may increase ground reaction forces (GRFs), which can have a negative effect on joints and bone health. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of backpacks on the GRFs generated by children during walking, running, and jumping. Twenty-one children from the fifth (G-5, n = 9) and ninth (G-9, n = 12) grades walked, ran, and jumped over a force plate. When walking, the G-5 had GRF increments in the first (17.3%; p < 0.001) and second (15.4%; p < 0.001) peak magnitude, and in the total integral of the vertical force (20%; p < 0.001), compared to the control condition (i.e., no backpack), and the G-9 had increments of 10.4%, 9%, and 9% (p < 0.001), respectively. The G-9 did not prolong their total stance time (p > 0.05), unlike the G-5 (p = 0.001). When running, total stance time increased 15% (p < 0.001) and 8.5% (p < 0.001) proportionally to the relative load carried, in the G-5 and G-9, respectively. Peak GRF did not increase in any group when running or landing from a jump over an obstacle. It was found that GRF was affected by the backpack load when walking and running. However, when landing from a jump with the backpack, schoolchildren smoothed the landing by prolonging the reception time and thus avoiding GRF peak magnitudes.

Keywords: backpack; children; gait; ground reaction forces; load-carriage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical vertical ground force (GRF)/time curves from one of the participants during unloaded walking and running, demonstrating the first peak (impact force peak—Fz1), relative minimum (Fz2), the second peak (Fz3), and the loading rate (LoadRate), normalized to body weight.

References

    1. Chow D.H., Ou Z.Y., Wang X.G., Lai A. Short-term effects of backpack load placement on spine deformation and repositioning error in schoolchildren. Ergonomics. 2010;53:56–64. doi: 10.1080/00140130903389050. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pascoe D.D., Pascoe D.E., Wang Y.T., Shim D.M., Kim C.K. Influence of carrying book bags on gait cycle and posture of youths. Ergonomics. 1997;40:631–641. doi: 10.1080/001401397187928. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chansirinukor W., Wilson D., Grimmer K., Dansie B. Effects of backpacks on students: Measurement of cervical and shoulder posture. Aust. J. Physiother. 2001;47:110–116. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60302-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hong Y., Cheung C.K. Gait and posture responses to backpack load during level walking in children. Gait Posture. 2003;17:28–33. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00050-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quesada P.M., Mengelkoch L.J., Hale R.C., Simon S.R. Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching. Ergonomics. 2000;43:293–309. doi: 10.1080/001401300184413. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources