Assessing the Acceptability of Vasectomy as a Family Planning Option: A Qualitative Study with Men in the Kingdom of Eswatini
- PMID: 31861151
- PMCID: PMC6950132
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16245158
Assessing the Acceptability of Vasectomy as a Family Planning Option: A Qualitative Study with Men in the Kingdom of Eswatini
Abstract
The uptake of vasectomy in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa is low. In Eswatini, a kingdom with strong patriarchal norms, the use of vasectomy is at 0.3%. This is despite great efforts to introduce vasectomy and involve men in reproductive health. This study explored the views of men about the acceptability of vasectomy and their willingness to adopt vasectomy as a family planning option. Focus group discussions were conducted with adult men recruited from health facilities located in rural, semi urban, and urban areas in two of the regions of Eswatini. A thematic approach was used to analyze the data. The acceptability of and intention to use vasectomy as a family planning option was very low. Cultural beliefs, societal norms, lack of knowledge about the procedure for vasectomy, and misconceptions influenced the acceptability of vasectomy greatly. The participants could not grasp the concept of a family planning method that is as permanent as vasectomy. However, the decisions to accept or reject vasectomy were influenced by their misconceptions and fears about vasectomy and were not based on facts. To address the need to involve men in reproductive health and improve the acceptability and adoption of vasectomy, planning should be conducted with them and informed by their understanding of their needs.
Keywords: Eswatini; acceptance; adoption; culture; family planning; vasectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Religious beliefs, social pressure, and stigma: Rural women's perceptions and beliefs about vasectomy in Pwani, Tanzania.PLoS One. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0230045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230045. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32196511 Free PMC article.
-
Perspectives of urban Ghanaian women on vasectomy.Reprod Health. 2017 Feb 8;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0286-5. Reprod Health. 2017. PMID: 28178993 Free PMC article.
-
Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania.Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007 Mar;33(1):13-21. doi: 10.1363/3301307. Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007. PMID: 17462984
-
Barriers to vasectomy acceptance and uptake in Nigeria: A review of the literature.Afr J Reprod Health. 2022 Mar;26(3):37-45. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i3.5. Afr J Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 37585110 Review.
-
A Review of 10 Years of Vasectomy Programming and Research in Low-Resource Settings.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Dec 28;4(4):647-660. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00235. Print 2016 Dec 23. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016. PMID: 28031302 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Getting Intentional about Intention to Use: A Scoping Review of Person-Centered Measures of Demand.Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Mar;53(1):61-132. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12182. Epub 2022 Feb 3. Stud Fam Plann. 2022. PMID: 35119110 Free PMC article.
-
Intention to use vasectomy and its associated factors among married men in Debre Tabor Town, North West Ethiopia, 2019.PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238293. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32881873 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to the participation of men in reproductive health care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.BMC Public Health. 2023 May 4;23(1):818. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15692-x. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37143008 Free PMC article.
-
Male Involvement in Family Planning Decisions in Malawi and Tanzania: What Are the Determinants?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(6):5053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065053. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36981959 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the readiness of health facilities to provide family planning services in low-resource settings: Insights from nationally representative service provision assessment surveys in 10 Countries.PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0290094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290094. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37972005 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chang Y.-H., Hsiao P.-J., Chen G.-H., Chang C.-H., Chen W.-C., Yeh C.-C., Huang C.-P., Chung C.-J., Chou E.C.-L., Chen K.-L. Economic fluctuation affects vasectomy utilization: A single-institution study. Urol. Sci. 2015;26:214–217. doi: 10.1016/j.urols.2015.06.155. - DOI
-
- WHO . Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. 5th ed. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2015.
-
- United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division . World Contraceptive Use 2012 (POP/DB/CP/Rev2012) United Nations; New York, NY, USA: 2012.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical