Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):21.
doi: 10.3390/s20010021.

Bee Swarm Activity Acoustic Classification for an IoT-Based Farm Service

Affiliations

Bee Swarm Activity Acoustic Classification for an IoT-Based Farm Service

Andrej Zgank. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Beekeeping is one of the widespread and traditional fields in agriculture, where Internet of Things (IoT)-based solutions and machine learning approaches can ease and improve beehive management significantly. A particularly important activity is bee swarming. A beehive monitoring system can be applied for digital farming to alert the user via a service about the beginning of swarming, which requires a response. An IoT-based bee activity acoustic classification system is proposed in this paper. The audio data needed for acoustic training was collected from the Open Source Beehives Project. The input audio signal was converted into feature vectors, using the Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (with cepstral mean normalization) and Linear Predictive Coding. The influence of the acoustic background noise and denoising procedure was evaluated in an additional step. Different Hidden Markov Models' and Gaussian Mixture Models' topologies were developed for acoustic modeling, with the objective being to determine the most suitable one for the proposed IoT-based solution. The evaluation was carried out with a separate test set, in order to successfully classify sound between the normal and swarming conditions in a beehive. The evaluation results showed that good acoustic classification performance can be achieved with the proposed system.

Keywords: IoT architecture; acoustic classification; activity monitoring; bee acoustic analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results”.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
IoT-based bee swarm activity monitoring service.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bee activity acoustic classification system’s block scheme using Hidden Markov Model (HMM) acoustic models.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bee activity acoustic classification system’s block scheme using Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) acoustic models.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) feature extraction block scheme.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mel-scale filter bank with eight filters.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Bee activity acoustic classification accuracy comparison.

References

    1. Zheng L., Li M., Wu C., Ye H., Ji R., Deng X., Che Y., Fu C., Guo W. Development of a smart mobile farming service system. Math. Comput. Model. 2011;54:1194–1203. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.11.053. - DOI
    1. Ryu M., Yun J., Miao T., Ahn I.Y., Choi S.C., Kim J. Design and implementation of a connected farm for smart farming system; Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE SENSORS; Busan, Korea. 1–4 November 2015; pp. 1–4.
    1. Jukan A., Masip-Bruin X., Amla N. Smart computing and sensing technologies for animal welfare: A systematic review. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2017;50:10. doi: 10.1145/3041960. - DOI
    1. Jayaraman P., Yavari A., Georgakopoulos D., Morshed A., Zaslavsky A. Internet of things platform for smart farming: Experiences and lessons learnt. Sensors. 2016;16:1884. doi: 10.3390/s16111884. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfert S., Ge L., Verdouw C., Bogaardt M.J. Big data in smart farming—A review. Agric. Syst. 2017;153:69–80. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources