Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 19;20(1):37.
doi: 10.3390/s20010037.

Gait Asymmetry Post-Stroke: Determining Valid and Reliable Methods Using a Single Accelerometer Located on the Trunk

Affiliations

Gait Asymmetry Post-Stroke: Determining Valid and Reliable Methods Using a Single Accelerometer Located on the Trunk

Christopher Buckley et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Asymmetry is a cardinal symptom of gait post-stroke that is targeted during rehabilitation. Technological developments have allowed accelerometers to be a feasible tool to provide digital gait variables. Many acceleration-derived variables are proposed to measure gait asymmetry. Despite a need for accurate calculation, no consensus exists for what is the most valid and reliable variable. Using an instrumented walkway (GaitRite) as the reference standard, this study compared the validity and reliability of multiple acceleration-derived asymmetry variables. Twenty-five post-stroke participants performed repeated walks over GaitRite whilst wearing a tri-axial accelerometer (Axivity AX3) on their lower back, on two occasions, one week apart. Harmonic ratio, autocorrelation, gait symmetry index, phase plots, acceleration, and jerk root mean square were calculated from the acceleration signals. Test-retest reliability was calculated, and concurrent validity was estimated by comparison with GaitRite. The strongest concurrent validity was obtained from step regularity from the vertical signal, which also recorded excellent test-retest reliability (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (rho) = 0.87 and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC21) = 0.98, respectively). Future research should test the responsiveness of this and other step asymmetry variables to quantify change during recovery and the effect of rehabilitative interventions for consideration as digital biomarkers to quantify gait asymmetry.

Keywords: accelerometer; asymmetry; gait; reliability; stroke; trunk; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
A single orbit with a fitted conic (ellipse).
Figure A2
Figure A2
Complete phase plot comprising 7 continuous gait cycles.
Figure A3
Figure A3
Indication of the different conic (ellipses) fitted to the major/minor axis and the first/second halves.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Indication of the instrumentation and the protocol used to collect the acceleration signal and the asymmetry parameters from the GaitRite mat. Also pictured is the acceleration-derived asymmetry variables and the means for the calculation of asymmetry following the processing of the raw acceleration signal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Indication of the correlation between the asymmetry variables quantified using a GaitRite mat and the variables proposed to measure asymmetry from the acceleration signals from the trunk. Black indicates a strong positive or negative correlation. * and ** denotes significance at the 0.05 and 0.01 level, respectively. V = Vertical acceleration, ML = Medial lateral acceleration, and AP = Anterior posterior acceleration.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moore S.A., Hickey A., Lord S., Del Din S., Godfrey A., Rochester L. Comprehensive measurement of stroke gait characteristics with a single accelerometer in the laboratory and community: A feasibility, validity and reliability study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2017;14:130. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0341-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gallanagh S., Quinn T.J., Alexander J., Walters M.R. Physical Activity in the Prevention and Treatment of Stroke. ISRN Neurol. 2011;2011:1–10. doi: 10.5402/2011/953818. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patterson K.K., Gage W.H., Brooks D., Black S.E., McIlroy W.E. Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: A comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. Gait Posture. 2010;31:241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fini N.A., Holland A.E., Keating J., Simek J., Bernhardt J. How physically active are people following stroke? Systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Phys. Ther. 2017;97:707–717. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bull F., Goenka S., Lambert V., Pratt M. Physical Activity for the Prevention of Cardiometabolic Disease. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; Washington, DC, USA: 2017. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources