Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 19;21(1):43.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21010043.

The Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Iron Deficiency Responses in Rice

Affiliations
Review

The Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Iron Deficiency Responses in Rice

Qian Li et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Iron (Fe) is an essential element required for plant growth and development. Under Fe-deficientconditions, plants have developed two distinct strategies (designated as strategy I and II) to acquire Fe from soil. As a graminaceous species, rice is not a typical strategy II plant, as it not only synthesizes DMA (2'-deoxymugineic acid) in roots to chelate Fe3+ but also acquires Fe2+ through transporters OsIRT1 and OsIRT2. During the synthesis of DMA in rice, there are three sequential enzymatic reactions catalyzed by enzymes NAS (nicotianamine synthase), NAAT (nicotianamine aminotransferase), and DMAS (deoxymugineic acid synthase). Many transporters required for Fe uptake from the rhizosphere and internal translocation have also been identified in rice. In addition, the signaling networks composed of various transcription factors (such as IDEF1, IDEF2, and members of the bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix) family), phytohormones, and signaling molecules are demonstrated to regulate Fe uptake and translocation. This knowledge greatly contributes to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying iron deficiency responses in rice.

Keywords: Fe acquisition; phytohormones; rice (Oryza sativa), Fe deficiency; strategy II; transcription factors; transporters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A simplified model of Fe uptake from the rhizosphere in rice. Rice not only synthesizes DMA in roots to chelate Fe3+ but also acquires Fe2+ through transporters OsIRT1 and OsIRT2. During the synthesis of DMA, there are three sequential enzymatic reactions catalyzed by the enzyme, OsNAS, OsNAAT, and OsDMAS. The TOM (transporter of mugineic acid family phytosiderophores) and OsYSL transporters are required for Fe uptake from the rhizosphere. OsPEZ2s are phenolic efflux transporters responsible for the transport of protocatechuic acid/caffeic acid (PCA/CA). The root cell is shown in the grey rounded rectangle. The vesicle is shown in the light green ellipse. Transporters are shown in the light orange ellipses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A simplified model of internal Fe translocation in rice. Citrate, NA, and DMA are the main chelators used to bind Fe within rice. OsFRDL1 encodes a citrate effluxer. OsYSL transporters are responsible for the translocation of Fe3+-DMA and Fe2+-NA from xylem to phloem. Xylem and phloem are shown in rounded rectangles. Transporters are shown in light green ellipses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The regulatory networks of the genes involved in Fe uptake and translocation in rice roots. Transcription factors are shown in light purple ellipses. Other regulatory proteins are shown in pink rounded rectangles. Hormones and signaling molecules are shown in light blue rounded rectangles. The genes involved in Fe uptake and translocation are shown in light orange rounded rectangles. Positive regulation is indicated by black arrows. Negative regulation is indicated by black blunt arrows. Broken lines indicate regulation with unknown mechanisms. Orange lines indicate that Fe signals are sensed by IDEF1, OsHRZ1, and OsHRZ2.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Briat J.F., Dubos C., Gaymard F. Iron nutrition, biomass production, and plant product quality. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20:33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haensch R., Mendel R.R. Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, Ni, Mo, B, Cl) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009;12:259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murgia I., Arosio P., Tarantino D., Soave C. Biofortification for combating ‘hidden hunger’ for iron. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:47–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guerinot M.L., Yi Y. Iron: Nutritious, noxious, and not readily available. Plant Physiol. 1994;104:815–820. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.3.815. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romera F.J., Alcantara E. Ethylene involvement in the regulation of Fe-deficiency stress responses by Strategy I plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2004;31:315–328. doi: 10.1071/FP03165. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms