Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;133(6):723-732.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors

Affiliations

Cancer Prevention in Primary Care: Perception of Importance, Recognition of Risk Factors and Prescribing Behaviors

Goli Samimi et al. Am J Med. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Acceptability and uptake of cancer preventive interventions is associated with physician recommendation, which is dependent on physician familiarity with available preventive options. The goal of this study is to evaluate cancer prevention perceptions, understanding of breast and ovarian cancer risk factors, and prescribing behaviors of primary care physicians.

Methods: We conducted cross-sectional. Web-based survey of 750 primary care physicians (250 each for obstetrics/gynecology, internal medicine, and family medicine) in the United States. Survey respondents were recruited from an opt-in health care provider panel.

Results: Perception of importance and the practice of recommending general and cancer-specific preventive screenings and interventions significantly differed by provider type. These perceptions and behaviors reflected the demographics of the population that the primary care physicians see within their respective practices. The majority of respondents recognized genetic/hereditary risk factors for breast or ovarian cancer, while epidemiologic or clinical risk factors were less frequently recognized. Prescribing behaviors were related to familiarity with the interventions, with physicians indicating that they more frequently reinforced a specialist's recommendation rather than prescribed a preventive intervention.

Conclusions: Cancer prevention perceptions, recognition of cancer risk factors, and prescribing behaviors differ among practice types and were related to familiarity with preventive options. Cancer prevention education and risk assessment resources should be more widely available to primary care physicians.

Keywords: Cancer prevention; Primary care physicians; Survey.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Perceptions and Recommendations of General and Cancer-Specific Preventive Screenings or Interventions.
Percentages of respondents who perceived the specified preventive screening or intervention as “very important” and “important”, and percentages of respondents who reported prescribing and reinforcing recommendations for the specified preventing screening or intervention, by provider type. p-value<0.05 between afamily medicine and internists for regularly recommends; binternists and OB/GYN physicians for regularly recommends; cfamily medicine and OB/GYN physicians for regularly recommends; dfamily medicine and internists for perceived as important; einternists and OB/GYN physicians for perceived as important; ffamily medicine and OB/GYN physicians for perceived as important.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Recognition of Factors Associated with Cancer Risk.
Percentages of respondents who indicated the specified factor as either increasing or decreasing risk, by provider type. p-value<0.05 between afamily medicine and internists for breast cancer; binternists and OB/GYN physicians for breast cancer; cfamily medicine and OB/GYN physicians for breast cancer; dfamily medicine and internists for ovarian cancer; einternists and OB/GYN physicians for ovarian cancer; ffamily medicine and OB/GYN physicians for ovarian cancer.

References

    1. Maresso KC, Tsai KY, Brown PH, Szabo E, Lippman S, Hawk ET. Molecular cancer prevention: Current status and future directions. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(5):345–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freedman AN, Yu B, Gail MH, Costantino JP, Graubard BI, Vogel VG, et al. Benefit/risk assessment for breast cancer chemoprevention with raloxifene or tamoxifen for women age 50 years or older. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(17):2327–33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, Evans DG, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304(9):967–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Havrilesky LJ, Gierisch JM, Moorman PG, Coeytaux RR, Urrutia RP, Lowery WJ, et al. Oral contraceptive use for the primary prevention of ovarian cancer. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2013(212):1–514. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kathawala RJ, Kudelka A, Rigas B. The Chemoprevention of Ovarian Cancer: the Need and the Options. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2018;4(3):250–60. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types