Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 20;9(1):19582.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-55561-5.

Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Residual Kidney Function and Peritoneal Membrane Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade on Residual Kidney Function and Peritoneal Membrane Function in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis

Sirayut Phatthanasobhon et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

We performed a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies in adult peritoneal dialysis patients to evaluate the effects of specific renin-angiotensin aldosterone systems (RAAS) blockade classes on residual kidney function and peritoneal membrane function. Key outcome parameters included the following: residual glomerular filtration rate (rGFR), urine volume, anuria, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (D/P Cr), and acceptability of treatment. Indirect treatment effects were compared using random-effects model. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) and odd ratios (ORs) were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We identified 10 RCTs (n = 484) and 10 non-randomised studies (n = 3,305). Regarding changes in rGFR, RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) were more efficacious than active control (SMD 0.55 [0.06-1.04] and 0.62 [0.19-1.04], respectively) with the protective effect on rGFR observed only after usage ≥12 months, and no differences among ACEIs and ARBs. Compared with active control, only ACEIs showed a significantly decreased risk of anuria (OR 0.62 [0.41-0.95]). No difference among treatments for urine volume and acceptability of treatment were observed, whereas evidence for D/P Cr is inconclusive. The small number of randomised studies and differences in outcome definitions used may limit the quality of the evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of studies. Abbreviations: RCTs, randomised-controlled trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network plot of eligible comparisons for primary outcomes. Notes: The circles (nodes) represent the available treatments and the lines (edges) represent the available comparisons. Size nodes and width of edges indicate weighting according to the numbers of studies involved for each treatment and comparison, respectively. Abbreviations: ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; D/P Cr, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine; MRAs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; rGFR, residual glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Network meta-analysis of RAAS blockade compared with active control for primary outcomes. Abbreviations: ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; CI, confidence interval; D/P Cr, dialysate-to-plasma creatinine; MRAs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists; NA, not applicable; OR, odd ratio; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade; RCTs, randomised-controlled trials; rGFR, residual glomerular filtration rate; SMD, standardised mean difference.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean change in rGFR by duration of treatment: evidence from NMA (RCTs and non-randomised studies). Note: Bold values indicate statistical significance. For study duration <6 or <12 months, SMDs >0 indicate that the treatment specified in the row is more efficacious than that in the column. For study duration ≥6 to <12 or ≥12 months, SMDs >0 indicate that the treatment specified in the column is more efficacious than that in the row column. To obtain SMDs for comparisons in the opposite direction, positive values should be converted into negative values, and vice versa. Abbreviations: ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; CIs, confidence intervals; NMA, network meta-analysis; RCTs, randomised-controlled trials; rGFR, residual glomerular filtration rate; SMDs, standardised mean differences.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Two-dimension rank plot of effect estimates according to efficacy on preservation of rGFR and incidence of anuria. Abbreviations: ACEIs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers; rGFR, residual glomerular filtration rate; SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mehrotra R, Devuyst O, Davies SJ, Johnson DW. The Current State of Peritoneal Dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:3238–3252. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams, J. D., Craig, K. J., von Ruhland, C., Topley, N. & Williams, G. T. The natural course of peritoneal membrane biology during peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl. S43–49 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: a reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:2158–2162. - PubMed
    1. Termorshuizen F, et al. The relative importance of residual renal function compared with peritoneal clearance for patient survival and quality of life: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1293–1302. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00362-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Wal WM, et al. Full loss of residual renal function causes higher mortality in dialysis patients; findings from a marginal structural model. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:2978–2983. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq856. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances