Teachers' perceptions on student evaluation of teaching as a tool for faculty development and quality assurance in medical education
- PMID: 31867382
- PMCID: PMC6905290
- DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_47_19
Teachers' perceptions on student evaluation of teaching as a tool for faculty development and quality assurance in medical education
Abstract
Background: Student evaluation of teaching (SET) is considered to be one of the most important as well as inexpensive resources for sustaining professional development in medical teaching. The aim of this project was to improve the quality of education in our medical college by using student feedback as a tool for faculty development. However, it is also important to obtain teachers' perceptions on SET.
Materials and methods: This was an educational research study conducted on a single practical/tutorial batch of fourth-semester students in pathology chosen by random selection. Feedback regarding teaching was collected for all the teachers in the department of pathology where the students had to rate the teachers on a scale of 1-5. Teachers' perceptions on students' feedback were gathered with the help of another structured prevalidated questionnaire containing 15 questions/items. The feedback data were obtained using a 5-point Likert scale. The scores obtained from the students' evaluation data and the teachers' perception data on the different items were analyzed using SPSS software version 20.0.
Results: Significant findings from students' feedback were that 80% of teachers had a median score of >4 in explicit curriculum, indicating that most of the students agreed that the teachers teach their core subject well. However, only 20% of teachers had a median score >4 in implicit curriculum. Teachers, in their feedback, fully agreed that students should be involved in the evaluation of teachers and that student feedback ensures the overall faculty development in the institute and can be used as a tool for quality assurance in medical education.
Conclusion: Students' feedback is one of the best methods of evaluation of teachers to ensure the overall faculty development and quality assurance in medical education. Thus, a regular feedback mechanism should be in place for the entire institution.
Keywords: Feedback; quality assurance; students; teachers.
Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Karle H. Global standards and accreditation in medical education: A view from the WFME supplement on the occasion of the ECFMG 50th Anniversary Invitational Conference Impact of International Medical Graduates on US and Global Health Care. Acad Med. 2006;81(Suppl 12):43–8. - PubMed
-
- MCI Vision 2015. 2011. [Last accessed on 2011 Dec 21]. Available from: http://www.mciindia.org/tools/announcement/MCI_booklet.pdf .
-
- The Role of Students in the Accreditation of Medical Education Programs in the U.S. and Canada July 2010 (For Schools with Full Accreditation Surveys in 2011-2012) Liaison Committee on Medical Education Committee on the Accreditation of Canadian Medical Schools. [Last accessed on 2011 Dec 21]. Available from: http://www.lcme.org/roleofstudents1112.pdf .
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
