Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2019 Nov 22;5(4):544-548.
doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2019.06.009. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Consecutive failing proximal landing zones

Affiliations
Case Reports

Consecutive failing proximal landing zones

Côme Bosse et al. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. .

Abstract

We report the case of a 77-year-old man who presented with successive aortic aneurysms during a 12-year period. He was first treated in 2006 for an abdominal aortic aneurysm with a bifurcated endograft, then in 2016 for a tender type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with a proximal aortic cuff with in situ laser fenestrations. He presented in 2018 with a 9-cm distal thoracic aorta aneurysm managed by an off-the-shelf t-Branch endograft (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). The perioperative course was uneventful, and 6-month follow-up computed tomography scan has shown freedom from endoleaks and branch patency. This case illustrates that apparently "healthy" aortic necks can degenerate after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Keywords: Abdominal aorta; Aneurysm; Branched stent graft; Endograft; Reintervention; Thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Computed tomography (CT) scan from 2016 showing a type IA endoleak with three-dimensional volume rendered reconstruction (A) and coronal (B) and axial (C) views.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Computed tomography (CT) scan at 1-year follow-up after proximal extension and in situ laser fenestration with total exclusion of the aneurysm with three-dimensional volume rendered reconstruction (A) and coronal (B) and axial (C) views.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Three-dimensional volume-rendered reconstruction (A) and coronal (B) and sagittal (C) orientations of the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan in 2018 showing an aneurysmal evolution of the distal thoracic aorta (DTA).
Fig 4
Fig 4
Computed tomography (CT) scan at 6-month follow-up after thoracoabdominal multibranched endograft implantation inside the previous endograft: total exclusion of the aneurysm with three-dimensional volume rendered reconstructions (A and B) and sagittal view (C). This shows a total of three endografts deployed one inside the other.

References

    1. Oberhuber A., Buecken M., Hoffmann M., Orend K.H., Mühling B.M. Comparison of aortic neck dilatation after open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:929–934. - PubMed
    1. Rodway A.D., Powell J.T., Brown L.C., Greenhalgh R.M. Do abdominal aortic aneurysm necks increase in size faster after endovascular than open repair? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008;35:685–693. - PubMed
    1. Monahan T.S., Chuter T.A., Reilly L.M., Rapp J.H., Hiramoto J.S. Long-term follow-up of neck expansion after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:303–307. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsilimparis N., Dayama A., Ricotta J.J. Remodeling of aortic aneurysm and aortic neck on follow-up after endovascular repair with suprarenal fixation. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:28–34. - PubMed
    1. Kaladji A., Cardon A., Laviolle B., Heautot J.F., Pinel G., Lucas A. Evolution of the upper and lower landing site after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:24–32. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources