Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;1483(1):67-79.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.14290. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

How youth mentoring relationships end and why it matters: a mixed-methods, multi-informant study

Renée Spencer  1 , Thomas E Keller  2 , Meghan Perry  2 , Alison L Drew  1 , Hyuny Clark-Shim  2 , John Paul Horn  1 , Miriam Miranda-Díaz  2 , Martha J McCormack  2
Affiliations

How youth mentoring relationships end and why it matters: a mixed-methods, multi-informant study

Renée Spencer et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Scant empirical attention has been devoted to understanding endings in youth mentoring relationships, despite the frequency with which they occur. This study examined data from a mixed-methods study of mentoring relationship endings in which youth mentees, the youth's parents or guardians, mentors, and program staff were surveyed about the closure process, and a subsample of program staff, mentors, and parents or guardians also participated in in-depth qualitative interviews. Findings from a descriptive analysis detailing the perceptions of multiple stakeholders in the closure process as reported in surveys are presented along with case studies derived from a case-based analysis of in-depth qualitative interview data. Most relationship endings were initiated by the mentors, and although some matches engaged in an intentional and direct closure process, more often the endings were unclear or even confusing to program participants. Implications for practice are discussed, including recommendations for more training and greater involvement of program staff in the closure process, as are implications for future research.

Keywords: match closure; mixed-methods; relationship endings; youth mentoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kram, K.E. 1983. Phases of the mentor relationship. Acad. Manag. J. 26: 608-625.
    1. Keller, T.E. 2005. The stages and development of mentoring relationships. In Handbook of Youth Mentoring. D.L. DuBois & M.J. Karcher, Eds.: 82-99. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    1. Johnson, W.B. 2015. On Being a Mentor: A Guide for Higher Education Faculty. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
    1. Herrera, C., D.L. DuBois & J.B. Grossman. 2013. The Role of Risk: Mentoring Experiences and Outcomes for Youth with Varying Risk Profiles. New York, NY: A Public/Private Ventures project distributed by MDRC.
    1. Kupersmidt, J.B., K.N. Stump, R.L. Stelter & J.E. Rhodes. 2017. Predictors of premature match closure in youth mentoring relationships. Am. J. Comm. Psychol. 59: 25-35.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources