Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 7;29(1):127-141.
doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-0047. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Effects of Rate Manipulation on Intelligibility in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Affiliations

Effects of Rate Manipulation on Intelligibility in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Ashley Sakash et al. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. .

Abstract

Purpose We evaluated the effects of a speech supplementation strategy to reduce rate and improve intelligibility in children with cerebral palsy. Method Twenty-five children with cerebral palsy (M age = 12.08 years) completed a structured speaking task in 2 speech conditions: habitual speech and slow speech. Fifteen children had mild intelligibility deficits; 10 had moderate-severe intelligibility deficits. In each condition, children repeated utterances of 2-7 words in length. In the habitual speech condition, children used their natural and unaltered speaking rate. In the slow speech condition, children were cued to insert pauses between words. Intelligibility ratings were obtained from orthographic transcriptions by unfamiliar adult listeners (n = 100). Speech rate, in words per minute, was measured for each utterance. Results All children, regardless of severity group, were able to reduce their rate of speech when implementing the slow speech strategy. Only children in the moderate-severe group showed an improvement in intelligibility when implementing the slow speech strategy. Although there was considerable individual variability, there was a greater improvement in intelligibility for longer utterances compared to shorter ones. Conclusion A slow speech strategy may be beneficial for children with moderate-severe intelligibility deficits who speak in longer utterances. Future studies should seek to further examine the clinical feasibility of slow speech for children with reduced intelligibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of a display for a five-word utterance during the habitual speech condition.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Example of a cueing display for four-word utterances. At the beginning of the task, all cells are blank. Children touch each cell, and a picture related to the prompted word appears in the cell.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Example of a cueing display for three-word utterances. Children touch each cell, and a picture related to the prompted word appears in the cell.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Changes in rate (words per minute) and intelligibility (percentage of words identified correctly) from the habitual speech condition to the slow speech condition for children in the mild severity group (green) and the moderate–severe group (orange). Thick lines represent group means, thin lines represent individual children, and arrows are used to visualize the change from the habitual condition to the slow condition.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Changes in rate (words per minute) and intelligibility (percentage of words identified correctly) from the habitual speech condition to the slow speech condition by utterance length for children in the mild severity group (green) and the moderate–severe group (orange). Thick lines represent group means, thin lines represent individual children, and arrows are used to visualize the change from the habitual condition to the slow condition. Points without lines are cases where a child completed the task for the utterance length in only one of the speech conditions. These points do not contribute to the plotted means.

References

    1. Allison K. M., & Hustad K. C. (2014). Impact of sentence length and phonetic complexity on intelligibility of 5-year-old children with cerebral palsy. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2013.876667 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ansel B. M., & Kent R. D. (1992). Acoustic–phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 296–308. - PubMed
    1. Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., & Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Boersma P., & Weenink D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
    1. Boliek C. A., & Fox C. M. (2014). Individual and environmental contributions to treatment outcomes following a neuroplasticity-principled speech treatment (LSVT LOUD) in children with dysarthria secondary to cerebral palsy: A case study review. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 372–385. - PubMed

Publication types