Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;103(6):798-803.
doi: 10.1111/cxo.13036. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Precision, agreement and utility of a contemporary non-contact corneal aesthesiometer

Sarah K Swanevelder  1 , Stuti L Misra  1 , Ellen F Tyler  1 , Charles Nj McGhee  1
Affiliations
Free article

Precision, agreement and utility of a contemporary non-contact corneal aesthesiometer

Sarah K Swanevelder et al. Clin Exp Optom. 2020 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Background: The measurement of corneal sensitivity threshold is important for several ocular surface diseases. The current study assesses the precision, agreement and utility of corneal sensitivity threshold measurement using a new, purpose-built non-contact corneal aesthesiometer.

Methods: A new instrument and an established non-contact corneal aesthesiometer device was used to measure the corneal sensitivity threshold on the right eye of 40 healthy human participants. Exclusion criteria included: corneal pathology, previous ocular surgery, ocular trauma, contact lens wear, diabetes or peripheral neuropathy. A forced-response, double-staircase method was used to obtain corneal sensitivity threshold from the mean of three readings per participant, for each non-contact corneal aesthesiometer. Screen demarcations relative to the corneal limbus facilitated alignment with the new device. Repeatability of the new instrument was tested three consecutive times on the same day. Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility and agreement were determined using one-way analysis of variance or analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analysis, respectively.

Results: Forty eyes of 40 participants were assessed (15:25 M:F, 30.5 ± 11.4 years). The new instrument demonstrated good repeatability (p = 0.47). There was no difference in the mean corneal sensitivity threshold between the new (0.60 ± 0.36 mbar) and established (0.60 ± 0.34 mbar) aesthesiometers (p = 0.92). Utilising the new instrument, inter-observer reproducibility (on a different subset of 10 participants) yielded thresholds of 0.41 ± 0.16 mbar and 0.42 ± 0.13 mbar (p = 0.88) for the two observers. Bland-Altman analysis confirmed good intra and inter-observer agreement. Screen demarcations relative to the limbus, enabled easier corneal alignment.

Conclusion: The new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer confirmed very good repeatability and reproducibility, as well as good agreement with the long-established instrument. Overall, this contemporary approach enables accurate and precise assessment of corneal sensitivity and thus, corneal nerve function, in normal and diseased cornea.

Keywords: corneal nerve function; corneal sensitivity threshold; instrument precision; non-contact corneal aesthesiometer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J. A new non-contact corneal aesthesiometer (NCCA). Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1996; 16: 101-107.
    1. Cousen P, Cackett P, Bennett H et al. Tear production and corneal sensitivity in diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2007; 21: 371-373.
    1. Murphy PJ, O'Brart DP, Stephenson CG et al. Effect of hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy on corneal sensitivity: a longitudinal study. J Refract Surg 2003; 19: 34-39.
    1. Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J. The effect of long-term, daily contact lens wear on corneal sensitivity. Cornea 2001; 20: 264-269.
    1. Pritchard N, Edwards K, Vagenas D et al. Corneal sensitivity as an ophthalmic marker of diabetic neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87: 1003-1008.

LinkOut - more resources