Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;13(2):129-136.
doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0378. Epub 2019 Dec 23.

Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Across Diverse Healthcare Systems: A Process Model from the Lung PROSPR Consortium

Affiliations

Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Across Diverse Healthcare Systems: A Process Model from the Lung PROSPR Consortium

Katharine A Rendle et al. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Numerous organizations, including the United States Preventive Services Task Force, recommend annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT for high risk adults who meet specific criteria. Despite recommendations and national coverage for screening eligible adults through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, LCS uptake in the United States remains low (<4%). In recognition of the need to improve and understand LCS across the population, as part of the larger Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening PRocess (PROSPR) consortium, the NCI (Bethesda, MD) funded the Lung PROSPR Research Consortium consisting of five diverse healthcare systems in Colorado, Hawaii, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Using various methods and data sources, the center aims to examine utilization and outcomes of LCS across diverse populations, and assess how variations in the implementation of LCS programs shape outcomes across the screening process. This commentary presents the PROSPR LCS process model, which outlines the interrelated steps needed to complete the screening process from risk assessment to treatment. In addition to guiding planned projects within the Lung PROSPR Research Consortium, this model provides insights on the complex steps needed to implement, evaluate, and improve LCS outcomes in community practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. PROSPR Lung Cancer Screening Process Model
Visual model depicting interrelated steps across the lung cancer screening process

References

    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry D, Brawley OW, et al. Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2418–2429. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330–338. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision Memo for Screening for Lung Cancer with Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT). 2015. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo... Accessed February 25, 2019.
    1. Gould MK, Sakoda LC, Ritzwoller DP, Simoff M, Neslund-Dudas C, Kushi LH, et al. Monitoring lung cancer screening use and outcomes at four Cancer Research Network sites. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(12):1827–1835. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms