Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;11(6):698-703.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00194.1.

Internal Medicine Residency Program Responses to the Increase of Residency Applications: Differences by Program Type and Characteristics

Michelle L Sweet, Christopher M Williams, Emily Stewart, Saumil M Chudgar, Steven V Angus, Michael Kisielewski, Lisa L Willett

Internal Medicine Residency Program Responses to the Increase of Residency Applications: Differences by Program Type and Characteristics

Michelle L Sweet et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Over the past decade, the number of residency applications has increased substantially, causing many residency programs to change their recruitment practices.

Objective: We determined how internal medicine (IM) residency programs have responded to increased applications by program type (community-based, community-based/university-affiliated, and university-based) and characteristics (percentage of international medical graduates, program size, and program director [PD] tenure).

Methods: The Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine conducted a national survey of 363 IM PDs in 2017. Five questions assessed IM program responses to the increased number of residency applications in 3 areas: changes in recruitment strategies, impact on ability to perform holistic review, and interest in 5 potential solutions. We performed a subgroup analysis to measure differences by program type and characteristics.

Results: The response rate was 64% (233 of 363). There were no differences by program type or characteristics for experiencing an increase in the number of applicants, altering recruitment practices, or conducting holistic reviews. There were moderate differences in alterations of recruitment practices by program characteristics and moderate differences in interest in proposed solutions by program type. Community-based programs had the greatest interest in a program-specific statement (59%, P = .032) and the lowest percentage in a national database of matched applicants (44%, P = .034).

Conclusions: IM residency programs are experiencing an increasing number of applications and are accommodating by adjusting recruitment practices in a variety of ways. A majority of IM PDs supported 4 of the 5 solutions, although the level of interest differed by program type.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Association of American Medical Colleges. ERAS national statistics: historical specialty specific data, residencies specialty summary, ERAS year 2011 and ERAS year 2018.
    1. National Resident Matching Program. Results and data: 2019 main residency match. 2019 https://mk0nrmp3oyqui6wqfm.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/NRMP... Accessed September 19.
    1. Angus SV, Williams CM, Kwan B, Vu TR, Harris L, Muntz M, et al. Drivers of application inflation: a national survey of internal medicine residents. Am J Med. 2018;131(4):447–452. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pereira AG, Chelminski PR, Chheda SG, Angus SV, Becker J, Chudgar SM, et al. Medical Student to Resident Interface Committee Workgroup on the Interview Season. Application inflation for internal medicine applicants in the match: drivers, consequences, and potential solutions. Am J Med. 2016;129(8):885–891. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Angus SV, Williams CM, Stewart E, Sweet ML, Kisielewski M, Willett LL. The current state of internal medicine residency recruitment: an analysis of program directors' perceptions and screening practices. Acad Med. In press. - PubMed

MeSH terms