Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 23;9(1):19673.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56218-z.

Exploring the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in cancer

Affiliations

Exploring the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in cancer

Rachel Howard et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

In cancer patients, a high pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poorer survival outcomes. Significant variation in the magnitude of this association has been observed between studies, but sources of this variation are poorly understood. Here, we explore differences in the prognostic potential of NLR between patient subgroups stratified by demographic and clinical characteristics using a retrospective cohort of 5,363 patients treated at Moffitt Cancer Center (Tampa, FL). We identify patients for whom NLR has maximum prognostic potential via adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and area under the curve analysis. NLR demonstrates stronger associations (HRs > 2) with survival among African-American patients, patients receiving radiation therapy, stage IV patients, and melanoma patients when compared with the overall study population (HR = 1.58). Sensitivity and specificity of NLR as a prognostic marker are also higher in these patient subgroups, and increase further with combinations of multiple "high-risk" demographic or clinical characteristics. In summary, NLR may have greater prognostic value in patients with certain demographic and clinical features. Future prospective studies could validate this hypothesis, after further characterization of populations in which NLR has maximum prognostic potential and the identification of meaningful thresholds for risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation in pre-treatment NLR. Box plots demonstrating baseline NLR in patients according to age, race, disease stage, cancer type and sex. Each point on the scatter plot represents an individual patient within the subgroup specified. The overlaid box plot presents the median and interquartile range of NLR for those patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival Analysis. Kaplan Meier survival curves demonstrating survival probability with increasing time post diagnosis in patients with above-median NLR (blue) as compared to below-median NLR (red) in the cohort as a whole (A) and for each studied cancer type (B–I). The shaded areas reflect 95% confidence intervals. The hatched lines show median survival time for patients above or below the median NLR. Group-specific medians for determining high NLR cutoff are calculated within each cancer subtype.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prognostic potential of NLR. ROC curves demonstrating the diagnostic potential (5-year overall survival) of NLR as a binary classifier. Each colored curve represents a different patient subgroup. The AUC is increased in patients with stage IV disease (A) and melanoma (B) as compared to those with lower stage disease and/or other cancer types. In the example, the accuracy of NLR as a prognostic marker is increased significantly in patients exhibiting multiple “high risk” characteristics.

References

    1. Hunter P. The inflammation theory of disease. The growing realization that chronic inflammation is crucial in many diseases opens new avenues for treatment. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(11):968–970. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.142. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krishnamoorthy S, Honn KV. Inflammation and disease progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25(3):481–491. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9016-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420(6917):860–867. doi: 10.1038/nature01322. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McMillan DC. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009;12(3):223–226. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32832a7902. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guthrie GJ, et al. The systemic inflammation-based neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio: experience in patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88(1):218–230. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.03.010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types