Response to Letter to the Editor
- PMID: 31875426
- DOI: 10.1002/em.22352
Response to Letter to the Editor
Comment on
-
Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020 Feb;61(2):276-290. doi: 10.1002/em.22343. Epub 2019 Nov 13. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020. PMID: 31633839 Free PMC article.
-
Comments on the "Evaluation of the Genotoxicity of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Male and Female Rats and Mice Following Subchronic Exposure" by Smith-Roe et al.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020 Feb;61(2):291-293. doi: 10.1002/em.22353. Epub 2020 Jan 7. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020. PMID: 31883146 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Witt KL, Livanos E, Kissling GE, Torous DK, Caspary W, Tice RR, Recio L. 2008. Comparison of flow cytometry- and microscopy-based methods for measuring micronucleated reticulocyte frequencies in rodents treated with nongenotoxic and genotoxic chemicals. Mutat Res. 649(1-2):101-113.
-
- Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. 2016. The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. Am Statist 70:129-133.
-
- Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Winham SJ, Garovic VD. 2015. Beyond Bar and line graphs: Time for a new data presentation paradigm. PLoS Biol 13(4):e1002128.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources