Orthopaedic osseointegration: Implantology and future directions
- PMID: 31876306
- DOI: 10.1002/jor.24576
Orthopaedic osseointegration: Implantology and future directions
Abstract
Osseointegration (OI) is the direct anchorage of a metal implant into bone, allowing for the connection of an external prosthesis to the skeleton. Osseointegration was first discovered in the 1960s based on the microscopic analysis of titanium implant placed into host bone. New bone was observed to attach directly to the metal surface. Following clinical investigations into dentistry applications, OI was adapted to treat extremity amputations. These bone anchored implants, which penetrate the skin and soft tissues, eliminate many of the challenges of conventional prosthetic sockets, such as poor fit and suspension, skin breakdown, and pain. Osseointegrated implants show promise to improve prosthesis use, pain, and function for amputees. The successful process of transcutaneous metal integration into host bone requires three synergistic systems: the host bone, the metal implant, and the skin-implant interface. All three systems must be optimized for successful incorporation and longevity of the implant. Osseointegration begins during surgical implantation of the metal components through a complex interplay of cellular mechanisms. While implants can vary in design-including the original screw, press fit implants, and compressive osseointegration-they face common challenges to successful integration and maintenance of fixation within the host bone. Overcoming these challenges requires the understanding of the complex interactions between each element of OI. This review outlines (a) the basic components of OI, (b) the science behind both the bone-implant and the skin-implant interfaces, (c) the current challenges of OI, and (d) future opportunities within the field.
Keywords: amputation; military; osseointegration; trauma.
© 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Transcutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis Systems (TOPS) for Rehabilitation After Lower Limb Loss: Surgical Pearls.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Jan 16;14(1):e23.00010. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00010. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024. PMID: 38268768 Free PMC article.
-
The state of the art of osseointegration for limb prosthesis.Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):5-16. doi: 10.1007/s13534-019-00133-9. eCollection 2020 Feb. Biomed Eng Lett. 2019. PMID: 32175127 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Single-Stage Press-Fit Osseointegration of the Radius and Ulna for Rehabilitation After Trans-Forearm Amputation.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Jul 10;14(3):e23.00015. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00015. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024. PMID: 38988477 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical technique of minor revision of a transcutaneous osseointegration prosthetic system (TOPS) with implant retention.Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Apr;37(2):133-141. doi: 10.1007/s00064-024-00882-6. Epub 2025 Jan 8. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2025. PMID: 39774901 Review. English.
-
Revision Amputation with Press-Fit Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputees.JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022 Jun 1;12(2):e21.00068. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.21.00068. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022. PMID: 36741033 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Metabolically Engineered Extracellular Vesicles Released From a Composite Hydrogel Delivery System Regulate the Microenvironment for Periprosthetic Osteolysis Treatment.J Extracell Vesicles. 2025 Jun;14(6):e70098. doi: 10.1002/jev2.70098. J Extracell Vesicles. 2025. PMID: 40545972 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Quality of Life in Transfemoral Amputee Using Bone-Anchored Prostheses vs. Socket Prostheses: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug;17(8):2234-2254. doi: 10.1111/os.70086. Epub 2025 Jul 18. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 40677172 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trichostatin A enhances the titanium rods osseointegration in osteoporotic rats by the inhibition of oxidative stress through activating the AKT/Nrf2 pathway.Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):22967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50108-1. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 38151509 Free PMC article.
-
An Organ System-Based Synopsis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence.Virulence. 2021 Dec;12(1):1469-1507. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1926408. Virulence. 2021. PMID: 34180343 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of fluid shear stress on expression of focal adhesion kinase in MG-63 human osteoblast-like cells on different surface modification of titanium.Bioengineered. 2021 Dec;12(1):4962-4971. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2021.1962686. Bioengineered. 2021. PMID: 34374319 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Brånemark R. Osseointegrated prostheses for rehabilitation following amputation. Unfallchirurg. 2017;120(4):285-292.
-
- Gailey R, McFarland LV, Cooper RA, et al. Unilateral lower-limb loss: prosthetic device use and functional outcomes in servicemembers from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):317-16.
-
- Van de Meent H, P, Hopman MT, Frolke JP. Walking ability and quality of life in subjects with transfemoral amputation: a comparison of osseointegration with socket prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2174-2178.
-
- Häggström E, Hagberg K, Rydevik B, Brånemark R. Vibrotactile evaluation: osseointegrated versus socket-suspended transfemoral prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1423-1434.
-
- Ogle OE. Implant surface material, design, and osseointegration. Dental Clinics of NA. 2015;59(2):505-520.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical