Effects of 2 Forms of Practice Facilitation on Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care: A Practice-randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial
- PMID: 31876643
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001260
Effects of 2 Forms of Practice Facilitation on Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care: A Practice-randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial
Abstract
Background: Effective quality improvement (QI) strategies are needed for small practices.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare practice facilitation implementing point-of-care (POC) QI strategies alone versus facilitation implementing point-of-care plus population management (POC+PM) strategies on preventive cardiovascular care.
Design: Two arm, practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.
Participants: Small and mid-sized primary care practices.
Interventions: Practices worked with facilitators on QI for 12 months to implement POC or POC+PM strategies.
Measures: Proportion of eligible patients in a practice meeting "ABCS" measures: (Aspirin) Aspirin/antiplatelet therapy for ischemic vascular disease, (Blood pressure) Controlling High Blood Pressure, (Cholesterol) Statin Therapy for the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease, and (Smoking) Tobacco Use: Screening and Cessation Intervention, and the Change Process Capability Questionnaire. Measurements were performed at baseline, 12, and 18 months.
Results: A total of 226 practices were randomized, 179 contributed follow-up data. The mean proportion of patients meeting each performance measure was greater at 12 months compared with baseline: Aspirin 0.04 (95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.06), Blood pressure 0.04 (0.02-0.06), Cholesterol 0.05 (0.03-0.07), Smoking 0.05 (0.02-0.07); P<0.001 for each. Improvements were sustained at 18 months. At 12 months, baseline-adjusted difference-in-differences in proportions for the POC+PM arm versus POC was: Aspirin 0.02 (-0.02 to 0.05), Blood pressure -0.01 (-0.04 to 0.03), Cholesterol 0.03 (0.00-0.07), and Smoking 0.02 (-0.02 to 0.06); P>0.05 for all. Change Process Capability Questionnaire improved slightly, mean change 0.30 (0.09-0.51) but did not significantly differ across arms.
Conclusion: Facilitator-led QI promoting population management approaches plus POC improvement strategies was not clearly superior to POC strategies alone.
References
-
- Ellner AL, Phillips RS. The coming primary care revolution. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32:380–386.
-
- Friedberg MW, Hussey PS, Schneider EC. Primary care: a critical review of the evidence on quality and costs of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:766–772.
-
- Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511–544.
-
- Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15:e71–e87.
-
- Ciolino JD, Jackson KL, Liss DT, et al. Design of healthy hearts in the heartland (H3): a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;71:47–54.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
