Drivers of High-cost Medical Complexity in a Medicaid Population
- PMID: 31876646
- PMCID: PMC7017939
- DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001261
Drivers of High-cost Medical Complexity in a Medicaid Population
Abstract
Background: Efforts to improve outcomes for the 10% of patients using two thirds of health care expenditures increasingly include addressing social determinants. Empiric evidence is needed to identify the highest impact nonmedical drivers of medical complexity and cost.
Objectives: This study examines whether complex, highest cost patients have different patterns of critical life adversity than those with better health and lower utilization.
Research design: Using a validated algorithm we constructed a complexity/cost risk patient profile. We developed and fielded a life experience survey (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/MLR/B920) to a representative sample, then examined how the prevalence of specific adversities varied between complex, high-cost individuals, and others.
Subjects: Surveys were sent to 9176 adult Medicaid members in Portland, Oregon.
Measures: Our primary variable was high medical complexity health cost risk; an alternative specification combined health cost risk and actual utilization/cost. Our survey instrument measured exposure to early and later-life adversities.
Results: Compared with healthy individuals in our population, medically complex individuals had significantly higher rates of adversity. The greatest risk of medical complexity and cost was associated with substance use [odds ratio (OR), 4.1], homelessness (OR, 3.0), childhood maltreatment (OR, 2.8), and incarceration (OR 2.4). Those with the highest prior year acute care utilization and cost had the highest rates of these same factors: substance use (62.5%), homelessness (61.7%), childhood maltreatment (55.5%), and incarceration (52.1%).
Conclusion: Clinical and policy strategies that mitigate high-impact social drivers of poor outcomes are likely critical for improving both health and costs for complex, high-needs patients.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Cohen S, Yu W. The concentration and persistence in the level of health expenditures over time: estimates for the US population, 2008–2009. Statistical Brief no. 354; Medical Expenditures Panel Survey. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2012.
-
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Better Care Playbook. 2018. Available at: www.bettercareplaybook.org/about-playbook.
-
- Long P, Abrams M, Milstein A, et al. Effective Care for High-Need Patients: Opportunities for Improving Outcomes, Value, and Health. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017. - PubMed
-
- Vickery KD, Bodurtha P, Winkelman TN, et al. Cross-sector service use among high health care utilizers in Minnesota after Medicaid expansion. Health Aff. 2018;37:62–69. - PubMed
-
- Bor J, Cohen GH, Galea S. Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980–2015. Lancet. 2017;389:1475–1490. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
