A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating geriatric consultation on older trauma patients
- PMID: 31876691
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002571
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating geriatric consultation on older trauma patients
Abstract
Background: Early involvement of geriatrics is recommended for older trauma patients.
Objective: This systematic review aimed to determine the impact of a geriatric assessment on mortality, hospital length of stay, discharge destination, and delirium incidence in patients 65 years and older admitted to a trauma center.
Methods: The protocol was developed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019131870). Search of five databases was completed April 2019. Two independent reviewers completed screening, full text review, and data abstraction. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes with at least two studies.
Results: A total of 928 unique citations were identified; eight were included in the final analysis. All were cohort studies, most of moderate to poor quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We found hospital length of stay decreased by mean of 1.11 days (95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.43), but mortality was unchanged (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.38) in older patients admitted to a trauma center who had a geriatric consultation. Meta-analysis of discharge destination and delirium incidence was not performed due to heterogeneity.
Conclusions: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes in older patients admitted to a trauma center after implementation of a geriatric trauma consultation service. We found a decrease in hospital length of stay but insufficient evidence of change in in-hospital mortality in older patients who received a geriatric consultation as part of their trauma care compared with those that received standard trauma care only. There is a need for more methodologically rigorous research in geriatric trauma.
Level of evidence: Systematic review and meta-analysis, level III.
References
-
- MacKenzie EJ, Morris JA Jr., Smith GS, Fahey M. Acute hospital costs of trauma in the United States: implications for regionalized systems of care. J Trauma. 1990;30(9):1096–1101; discussion 1101-1103.
-
- Jacobs DG, Plaisier BR, Barie PS, Hammond JS, Holevar MR, Sinclair KE, Scalea TM, Wahl W, EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. Practice management guidelines for geriatric trauma: the EAST practice management guidelines work group. J Trauma. 2003;54(2):391–416.
-
- Kuhne CA, Ruchholtz S, Kaiser GM, Nast-Kolb D, Working Group on Multiple Trauma of the German Society of Trauma. Mortality in severely injured elderly trauma patients—when does age become a risk factor? World J Surg. 2005;29(11):1476–1482.
-
- Taylor MD, Tracy JK, Meyer W, Pasquale M, Napolitano LM. Trauma in the elderly: intensive care unit resource use and outcome. J Trauma. 2002;53(3):407–414.
-
- Matsushima K, Schaefer EW, Won EJ, Armen SB, Indeck MC, Soybel DI. Positive and negative volume-outcome relationships in the geriatric trauma population. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(4):319–326.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
